刘献廷《广阳杂记》抄刻本研究

A Study of Liu Xianting's Copy and Engraved Versions of Guang Yang Miscellaneous Records

《广阳杂记》一书,自清代学者黄宗夏辑录其师刘献廷晚年的《日记》《日知录》及读书札记成书后,百馀年来皆以抄本传世。因其内容广涉经、史、子、集四部之学和其它领域,长期以来为学者所重视;近代以来,刻本蜂出,形成繁杂交错的抄刻系统。学者在抄传《广阳杂记》时,任意删削,导致《广阳杂记》在漫长的抄传过程中形成存目悬殊的不同版本,戴望所藏足本反而湮没不传。学者们在研究过程中,秉持不同的学术观点,俨然形成考据与经世两种不同的评价体系。虽然诸多研究不乏灼见,但也出现不少误读与误解。笔者依据《广阳杂记》诸抄刻本,从书籍史的角度,对其进行梳理与研究,通过比较几种主要抄刻本的词目删存情况,探求诸家的去取标准,同时探析《广阳杂记》所产生的学术影响。

The book of Guang Yang Miscellany Records,since Huang Zong Xia recorded Liu Xian Ting's late"Diary","Journal of the Day"and reading journals into a book,for more than a hundred years,these records have been circulated in copies,and very few copies have been handed down.In modern times,with the political changes and academic changes in Chinese society,copies and engravings of the Guang Yang Miscellany were produced,forming a diverse and intertwined system of copying and engraving.The scholars,in copying and transmitting the Guang Yang Miscellany,which made arbitrary deletions,resulting in the formation of different versions of the Guang Yang Miscellany in the long process of copying and transmitting,with the footnotes in Dai Wang's collection disappeared instead of it.The resultant misinterpretations and misunderstandings have not yet been replaced.The author from the angle of books,having a research and going through different versions comparing with each other,and having a survey on the great influence of Guan Yang Miscellany.