摘要
司马迁《史记》的取裁别择多以“古文”为标准,其文本具体包括《诗》《书》《春秋》《左传》《五帝德》《帝系姓》《国语》《论语》诸种。汉景、武之际虽已有孔壁古文《尚书》,但“古文”并不特指文字。太史公对“古文”的理解深受战国齐鲁学术之影响。所谓“古文”,绾合“古道”“文学”两词,其所指大致不离孔门所传六艺传记,除用以表示五经遗文外,亦含有先王道术的义蕴。在系统目录《别录》《七略》编成后,“古文”被“六艺略”这一更为具体、明确的知识体系取代。
The present paper contends that, in writingGrand Scribe’s Record, Sima Qian consulted predominantly primary sources written in Guwen, that is, the antique scripts. It particularly points out that Guwen in this context does not refer exclusively to more ancient scripts but to the combination of ancient spirit and writing systems. This reflects that Sima Qian had an intellectual affinity with the scholarship prevalent in Qi and Lu of the Warring States.
出处
《史林》
北大核心
2023年第1期87-96,218,共11页
Historical Review
