摘要
唐寅款《梦仙草堂图》卷中有顾应祥、翁桂、费念慈等明清名家题跋及庞元济鉴藏印。关于此卷真伪,费念慈、庞元济、吴湖帆、高居翰、傅申、林霄等人持不同观点。画后第一跋无款无印,其作者的确立是判断唐寅款画跋真伪的关键。此跋与唐寅同期书风不合,且款中称谓有违常理,应系伪作。画中草堂+松树+峻石的构图方式与周臣《春泉小隐图》非常相似,说明二者之间拥有内在的联系。故笔者认为此画并非唐寅真迹,受画人汪东原亦非汪道昆从弟汪道弘。
In Tang Yin’s Mengxian Caotang Tu Scroll contains prefaces and postscripts by famous Ming and Qing artists such as Gu Yingxiang,Weng Gui and Fei Nianci,and connoisseurship seals by Pang Yuanji.Regarding the authenticity of this Scroll,Fei Nianci,Pang Yuanji,Wu Hufan,Gao Juhan,Fu Shen;Lin Xiao and others hold different views.There is no signature or seal on the first postscript of the painting,whose author’s recognition is the key to judge the authenticity of the postscript of Tang Yin’s painting.The calligraphy style of this postscript is inconsistent with that of Tang Yin in the same period,and the Appellation of this postscript goes against common sense,so this work should be a fake.The composition of the hut,pines,stones is very similar to those of Zhou Chen’s Chunquan Xiaoyin Tu,which shows that there is an intrinsic relationship between them.This painting is not the authentic painting of Tang Yin,and the painter Wang Dongyuan is not Wang Daohong,the cousin of Wang Daokun.
出处
《艺术设计研究》
CSSCI
2023年第1期94-99,共6页
Art & Design Research
基金
2022年度安徽省新时代育人省级质量工程项目(研究生教育)“传世草堂图与文学融通研究”(项目编号:2022xscx120)的阶段性成果。