3Tversky A, Simonson I. Context Dependent Preferences [ J] . Man-agement Science, 1993,39: 1179 - 1189.
4Simonson I. Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction andCompromise Effects [ J] . Journal of Consumer Research, 1989,16(2): 158 -174.
5Pettibone J C,Wedell D H. Examining Models of NondominatedDecoy Effects Across Judgment and Choice [ J] . Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 81 : 300 -328.
6Huber J, Payne J W, Puto C. Adding Asymmetrically DominatedAlternatives : Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis[J] . Journal of Consumer Research,1982,9 ( 1 ) ; 90 -98.
7Sheng S,Parker A M, Nakamoto K. Understanding the Mechanismand Determinants of Compromise Effects [ J] . Psychology & Market-ing, 2005, 22: 591 -609.
8Hedgcock W, Rao A R. Trade - off Aversion as an Explanation forthe Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingStudy [J] . Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46: 1 -13.
9Groner R,Groner M,Bischof W F. Methods of Heuristics [ M] .Citeseer,1993.
10Slovic P. Choice between Equally Valued Alternatives [ J] . Journalof Experimental Psychology ; Human Perception and Performance,1975,1 (3): 280-287.