期刊文献+

错误类特称描述语的认知语用阐释——基于有声思维证据

A Pragmacognitive Study on Misdescription:Evidence from a Thinkaloud Protocol
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在历时数十年的语义—语用界面之争中,错误类特称描述语常处于争论的焦点。本研究回顾了身处不同语言哲学流派的学者所做的相关分析,基于有声思维实验和回溯性访谈探讨语言编码和语境在错误类特称描述语的作用及相应的理解机制,并用关联统领下涵盖默认语义的话语解读模式来解释其理解机制。本研究为错误类特称描述语提供认知语用视角的阐释,试图为语义—语用界面以及话语识解机制研究做出一点贡献。 In the debate over the SemanticsPragmatics interface that has lasted for decades,misdescription is often the focus of controversy.This research reviews different schools of linguistic philosophy on this topic,and explores the role of linguistic encoding and context and the corresponding comprehension mechanism based on a thinkaloud protocol and a retrospective interview,and interprets misdescription on a relevancetheoretic account incorporating default meaning.This study hopes to offer a pragmacognitive account for misdescription,thus contributing to the research on the SemanticsPragmatics interface and the utterance comprehension mechanism.
作者 李娟
出处 《外国语文研究(辑刊)》 2022年第2期190-202,共13页
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“二语学习者指称表达的认知加工处理”(编号:19YJC740028)的部分成果。
关键词 错误类特称描述语 关联论 默认语义论 语境 misdescription Relevance Theory Default Semantics context
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1陈新仁.试探“经济原则”在言语交际中的运行[J].外语学刊,1994(1):8-12. 被引量:76
  • 2沈家煊.语用学和语义学的分界[J].外语教学与研究,1990,22(2):26-35. 被引量:45
  • 3Ariel, M. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar [M]. Cambridge.. CUP.
  • 4Bach, K. 1984. Default reasoning: Jumping to conclusions and knowing when to think twice [J]. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65: 37-58.
  • 5Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 6Bach, K. 1994a. Conversational impliciture [J]. Mind and Language 9: 124-162.
  • 7Bach, K. 1994b. Semantic slack: What is said and more [A]. In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.). Foun- dations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives [C]. London: Routledge. 267-291.
  • 8Bach, K. 1999a. The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters [A]. In K. Turner (ed.). The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View [C]. New York: Elsevier Science. 65-84.
  • 9Bach, K. 1999b. The myth of conversational impliciture [J]. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-366.
  • 10Bach, K. 2001. You don't say? [J]. Synthese 128: 15-44.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部