期刊文献+

胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学与胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒在咽喉反流诊断中的一致性分析 被引量:1

Consistency analysis of pepsin immunohistochemistry and pepsin test box in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒、胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学及反流症状指数量表(RSI)、反流体征评分量表(RFS)评分在诊断咽喉反流性疾病(LPRD)中的一致性。方法:回顾性分析2020年5月-2021年12月就诊于昆明医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉科61例喉科疾病住院患者的临床资料,记录患者的RSI、RFS量表的评分数值、胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学Formwitz评分数值,胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒结果,采用ICC组内相关系数、Kappa一致性分析三种检测方法。结果:61例患者中胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒阳性30例,阴性31例,阳性率49.18%;胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学检测阳性率45.90%(28/61),两者间诊断一致率为70.49%,且两者间一致性较高(κ=0.409);RSI、RFS量表诊断LPRD阳性率62.30%(38/61),与胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒一致率为73.77%,且两者间一致性较高(κ=0.486)。以胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学为参考标准,胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒的敏感度为71.43%(20/28)、特异度为69.70%(23/33)、阳性预测值为66.67%(20/30)、阴性预测值为74.19%(23/31);以RSI、RFS量表诊断为参考标准,胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒的敏感度为89.29%(25/28)、特异度为60.61%(20/33)、阳性预测值为65.79%(25/38)、阴性预测值为86.96%(20/23)。ICC组内相关系数分析:ICC值为0.628,95%可信区间(0.497~0.741),三种方法一致性较好。结论:RSI、RFS量表评分与胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒结果的一致性较高,胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒与胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学同样有较好的一致性,胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒作为非侵入性诊断技术,可以联合胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学及RSI、RFS量表广泛应用于咽喉反流的诊断。 Objective:To analyze the consistency of pepsin assay kit,pepsin IHC,reflux symptom index(RSI) and reflux finding score(RFS) in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD).Methods:The clinical data of 61 inpatients with laryngeal diseases who were admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from May 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.The RSI and RFS scores,the Formwitz score of pepsin immunohistochemistry,and the results of pepsin detection kit were recorded.ICC group correlation coefficient and Kappa consistency analysis was used for three detection methods.Results:Among 61 patients,30 cases were positive and 31 cases were negative for the pepsin test kit,with a positive rate of 49.18%.The positive rate of pepsin immunohistochemistry was 45.90%(28/61),and the diagnostic agreement rate between the two was 70.49%.The consistency between them was high(κ=0.409).The positive rate of RSI and RFS in diagnosing LPRD was 62.30%(38/61),and the consistency rate was 73.77% with pepsin detection kit.The consistency between them was high(κ=0.486).Taking pepsin IHC as the reference standard,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pepsin detection kit were 71.43%(20/28),69.70%(23/33),66.67%(20/30) and 74.19%(23/31),respectively.Using RSI and RFS scales as reference criteria,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pepsin detection kit were 89.29%(25/28),60.61%(20/33),65.79%(25/38) and 86.96%(20/23),respectively.Analysis of correlation coefficient within ICC group:ICC value was 0.628,95% confidence interval(0.497-0.741),the three methods have good consistency.Conclusion:The RSI and RFS scale scores were in good agreement with the pepsin test kit,and the pepsin test kit was also in good agreement with pepsin immunohistochemistry.As a non-invasive diagnostic technique,the pepsin test kit can be widely used in the diagnosis of pharyngeal reflux in combination with pepsin immunohistochemistry and RSI and RFS scale.
作者 高竞逾 罗仁婧 阮标 刘卓慧 龙瑞清 江超武 程晟 王艳 苏路 李鹏 GAO Jingyu;LUO Renjing;RUAN Biao;LIU Zhuohui;LONG Ruiqing;JIANG Chaowu;CHENG Sheng;WANG Yan;SU Lu;LI Peng(Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China;Department of Otolaryngology,Kunming Yan'an Hospital;Department of General Surgery,Kunming Yan'an Hospital)
出处 《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期97-102,106,共7页 Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金 昆明市卫生健康委员会卫生科研项目(No:2020-04-01-011)。
关键词 咽喉反流性疾病 胃蛋白酶免疫组织化学 胃蛋白酶检测试剂盒 诊断 laryngopharyngeal reflux disease pepsin immunohistochemistry pepsin detection kit diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献94

  • 1Mursalin M.Anis,Mir-Muhammad Razavi,Xiao Xiao,Ahmed M.S.Soliman.Association of gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngeal cancer[J].World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,2018,4(4):278-281. 被引量:5
  • 2Sara Emerenziani,Maria Paola Rescio,Michele Pier Luca Guarino,Michele Cicala.Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and obesity, where is the link?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(39):6536-6539. 被引量:9
  • 3Jeong Soo Ahn,Chun-Sick Eom,Christie Y Jeon,Sang Min Park.Acid suppressive drugs and gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(16):2560-2568. 被引量:13
  • 4王进,王荣光,韩东一,杨伟炎.喉咽反流[J].国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册),2005,29(5):286-288. 被引量:17
  • 5陈曦,李进让,孙建军.喉咽返流性疾病[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,21(16):764-768. 被引量:9
  • 6Postma GN, Belafsky PC, Aviv JE, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux testing[ J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) :14- 18.
  • 7Reichel O, Issing WJ. Impact of different pH thresholds for 24- hour dual probe pH monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux [ J ]. J Laryngol Otol, 2008, 122 (5) : 485 -489.
  • 8Cohen JT, Bach KK, Postma GN, et al. Clinieal manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux [ J ]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 ( 9 Suppl 2 ) : 19-23.
  • 9Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS) [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(8) :1313-1317.
  • 10Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI) [ J ]. J Voice, 2002, 16 (2) :274- 277.

共引文献159

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部