2020东京奥运会乒乓球混双决赛中日双方运动员技战术特征对比研究

Comparative Study on Technical and Tactical Characteristics of Chinese and Japanese Table Tennis Players in Mixed Doubles Finals of 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games

运用文献资料法、录像观察法、乒乓球双打技战术8轮次3段法等方法对东京奥运会乒乓球混双决赛中日双方运动员的技战术特征进行对比分析,结果显示:(1)伊藤美诚发-刘诗雯接、水谷隼发-刘诗雯接和许昕发-伊藤美诚接轮次是许昕/刘诗雯在本场比赛的薄弱环节;(2)许昕/刘诗雯与水谷隼/伊藤美诚在发抢段的得分率均处于较高水平,得分率分别为75%和63.3%;(3)许昕/刘诗雯接抢段的得分率为52.5%,高于水谷隼/伊藤美诚;(4)在相持段,许昕/刘诗雯的得分率36.4%评估为不及格,使用率43.3%为较高,对比水谷隼/伊藤美诚的得分率47.4%,相持段高使用率、低得分率是许昕/刘诗雯失利的主要因素。

By using the methods of literature review, video observation, table tennis doubles technique and tactics eight rounds and three sections, this paper analyzes the technical and tactical characteristics of the Chinese and Japanese players in the mixed doubles final of the Tokyo Olympic Games. The results show that:(1) The weak links of Xu Xin/Liu Shiwen in this game are Ito Mima sending Liu Shiwen receiving, Mizutani Jun sending Liu Shiwen receiving, and Xu Xin sending Ito Mima receiving;(2) The scoring rates of Xu Xin/Liu Shiwen and Mizutani Jun/Ito Mima in the hair snatch section were both at a high level, with 75% and 63.3% respectively;(3) Xu Xin/Liu Shiwen scored 52.5% higher than Mizutani Jun/Ito Mima in the snatching section;(4) In the stalemate, the score rate of Xu Xin/Liu Shiwen was 36.4%, which was assessed as failed, and the utilization rate was 43.3%, which was higher. Compared with the score rate of Mizutani Jun/Ito Mima, the score rate was 47.4%. The high utilization rate and low scoring rate in the stalemate were the main factors for Xu Xin/Liu Shiwen’s failure.