论民国旧体文学史的建构及其意义

On the Construction and Significance of the History of the Old-style Literature in the Republic of China

当前关于民国旧体文学的研究日益兴起,但尚未有研究“民国旧体文学史”建构问题的论著出现。根据已有的文学史建构与撰著的方式,应当从历史纵观、分别横剖、综合研究这三种研究方式入手来建构民国旧体文学史。这不仅是对“五四”以来流行的文学观念的反拨与修正,也是对20世纪90年代提倡的“打通古今”“古代、现代会通”等学术思潮的回应与实践;不仅可以补充与拓展近代文学史领域,为近代文学学科的发展提供新思路,还将为民国新文学史的研究提供参照,以真正实现现代文学史专家一直要做到的“原生态”研究设想,刺激现代文学研究思维新变。民国旧体文学史的建构有利于诊断、发现与纠正当前文学史研究、撰著的误区,从而为现当代旧体文学史的建构以及当前“现当代诗词入史”的争论等问题提供解决路径与启示。

Currently,the research on the Classical-form literature of the Republic of China(1912—1949)is emerging,but there is no treatise on the construction of the history of the Classical-form literature of the Republic of China(1912—1949). According to the way of constructing and writing literary history,we should take a longitudinal view of history,separate cross-section,and comprehensive study to construct“the history of Classical-form literature of the Republic of China”(1912—1949). This is not only a rebuttal and revision of the literary concepts popular since the May Fourth Movement,but also a response and practice to the academic trend of“bridging the ancient and modern”and“convergence of ancient and modern”advocated in the 1990s of the 20th century. It will not only supplement and expand the field of modern literary history and provide new ideas for the development of modern literary disciplines,but also provide a reference for the study of the new literary history of the Republic of China,so as to truly realize the“original”research vision that modern literary history experts have been trying to achieve and stimulate new changes in modern literary research thinking. The construction of“the history of Classical-form literature of the Republic of China”(1912—1949)is conducive to diagnosing,discovering and correcting the misunderstandings of current literary history research and writing,thus providing a solution and inspiration for the construction of the history of Classical-form literature of modern and contemporary times,as well as the current debate on“the inclusion of modern and contemporary poetry into history”.