期刊文献+

考虑企业社会责任和利他关切的再制造供应链决策研究

Research on Remanufacturing Supply Chain Decision DecisionMaking Considering Corporate CorporateSocial Responsibility Responsibilityand AltruisticltruisticConcerns Concerns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在再制造商利他中性和利他关切两种情形下,构建了再制造商和零售商共同分担企业社会责任(CSR)的再制造供应链决策模型,并将两种决策模型的均衡结果进行了比较和仿真分析。研究表明:(1)再制造商的利他关切和企业社会责任分担行为有利于再制造产品批发价和零售价的降低,提升回收率和市场需求量,进而提升零售商利润、消费者剩余和社会福利水平。(2)再制造供应链各成员利润与各自分担的社会责任比例呈负相关关系。(3)再制造商的利他关切程度和社会责任分担比例并非越高越好,应在保障自身一定盈利的前提下,将利他关切程度与社会责任水平控制在合理范围内,才有助于实现再制造供应链整体利润与社会福利的最优化。 Under the remanufacturer altruism neutral and altruistic concern,a remanufacturing supply chain decision model is established in which remanufacturer and retailer share corporate social responsibility(CSR).The equilibrium results of the two decision models are compared and simulated.The results show that:(1) The altruistic concern and CSR sharing behavior of remanufacturers are conducive to reducing the wholesale price and retail price of remanufactured products,increasing the recovery rate and market demand,and thus improving the retailer's profit,consumer surplus and social welfare.(2) The profit of each member of the remanufacturing supply chain is negatively correlated with the proportion of social responsibility they share.(3) The higher the level of altruism concern and social responsibility sharing ratio of remanufacturers is not the better,so it is necessary to control the level of altruism concern and social responsibility within a reasonable range on the premise of ensuring certain profits of remanufacturers,so as to realize the optimization of profit and social welfare of remanufacturing supply chain.
作者 黎晓帆 LI Xiaofan(School of Management,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China)
出处 《物流科技》 2023年第7期107-111,共5页 Logistics Sci-Tech
基金 国家社科基金项目“突发事件冲击下再制造供应链履责困境及协同治理研究”(20BGL113) 江苏大学科研立项项目“应对需求突变的再制造供应链企业履责行为及协同履责实现机制研究”(21C230)。
关键词 再制造供应链 企业社会责任 利他关切 STACKELBERG博弈 remanufacturing supply chain corporate social responsibility altruistic concern Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1王玉燕,李帮义,申亮.供应链、逆向供应链系统的定价策略模型[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(4):40-45. 被引量:122
  • 2Amaeshi K, Osuji O K, Nnodim P. Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 81(1): 223-234.
  • 3Cater C R, Jennings M M. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships [J]. Transportation Research E, 2002, 38(1): 37-52.
  • 4Chiou T, Chan H K, Lettice F, et al. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan [J]. Transportation Research E, 2011, 47(6): 822-836.
  • 5Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach [M] Boston:Pitman/Ballinger, 1984.
  • 6OECD. Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for governments [M].Paris:OECO, 2001.
  • 7Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit [M]//Zimmerli W C,Holzinger M,Richte K.Corporote ethics and Corporate governance. New York:Springer,2007.
  • 8Baron D P. Business and its environment [M]. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2006.
  • 9Hsueh C F, Chang M S. Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 190 (1): 116-129.
  • 10Ni Debing, Li K, Tang Xiaowo. Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3): 1269-1279.

共引文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部