摘要
针灸临床的治疗方案普遍采用多个穴位组成的经验处方。对于许多疾病的针灸治疗,并没有确切的证据证明众多穴位配伍的疗效一定优于取用更少的穴位甚至取用单个穴位的疗效。研究提示,多个穴位组成的经验处方中可能存在着“滥竽充数”的无效穴位,这对于普遍采用多穴位处方的经验习惯提出了挑战,但经验惯性对这类挑战几乎没有做出过什么反应。对这一现状的原因进行了分析,认为针灸疗法的收费标准弱化了多穴位处方的经验习惯与穴位配伍规律研究之间的关系,并提出经验处方与穴位配伍研究之间需要维系必要的张力,以维持二者之间积极的互动关系。
The clinical treatment scheme of acupuncture and moxibustion generally adopts the empirical prescription composed of multiple acupoints.There is no definite evidence that the efficacy of multiple acupoints is better than that of fewer acupoints or even one acupoint for many diseases treated by acupuncture and moxibustion.The research suggests that some invalid acupoints may"be there just to make up the number"in the empirical prescription composed of multiple acupoints,which poses a challenge to the empirical habit of adopting multiple acupoints prescription generally,but the empirical inertia has hardly responded to such challenges.This paper analyzes the reasons for this situation.It is considered that the charging standard of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy weakens the relationship between the empirical habit of multiple acupoints prescription and the study of acupoints compatibility,and it is proposed that the necessary tension should be maintained between empirical prescription and acupoint compatibility in order to maintain positive interaction.
作者
陈少宗
晁毓桥
张丽丽
CHEN Shaozong;CHAO Yu-qiao;ZHANG Li-li(Research Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,China)
出处
《医学与哲学》
北大核心
2023年第1期63-66,共4页
Medicine and Philosophy
基金
2022年国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFC3500602)
2019年国家重点研发计划资助项目(2019YFC1712100)
2018年山东中医药大学科研创新基金资助项目(2018-220315)。
关键词
穴位配伍规律
临床经验
科学研究
张力
acupoints compatibility
clinical experience
scientific research
tension