期刊文献+

一种新型可塑形骨填充材料的制备及骨修复能力研究 被引量:1

Preparation and bone repair capability of a new plastic bone filler material
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的制备一种黏性载体和成骨基质颗粒均来源于人骨的可塑形骨填充材料,通过动物实验评价其安全性和骨诱导能力。方法取自愿捐赠的人体长骨,采用粉碎、清洗、脱矿等方法制备脱钙骨基质(demineralized bone matrix,DBM)颗粒,再将DBM颗粒经温浴法制备骨基质明胶(bone matrix gelatin,BMG),将BMG及DBM颗粒混合制备成可塑形骨填充材料(实验组);以单纯DBM颗粒作为对照组。取15只6~9周龄健康雄性无胸腺裸小鼠,于两侧臀中肌与臀大肌间制备肌间空隙,均植入实验组材料,术后1、4、6周处死动物,行HE组织学染色评价异位成骨效果。取8只9月龄日本大耳兔,于两侧后肢髁骨处制备直径6 mm骨缺损,左、右侧分别填充实验组和对照组材料,术后12、26周处死动物,行Micro-CT及HE组织学染色评价骨缺损修复效果。结果异位成骨实验HE染色示,术后1周可观察到大量软骨细胞,术后4、6周可观察到明显新生软骨组织。兔髁骨缺损修复实验HE染色示,术后12周,部分材料被吸收,实验组及对照组均可观察到新生软骨;术后26周,大部分材料被吸收,对照组可观察到大量新生骨,实验组可观察到新生骨单元结构。Micro-CT观测示,实验组成骨速率及成骨面积均优于对照组。骨形态计量学参数检测示,两组术后26周各参数均较术后12周显著增加(P<0.05)。术后12周,实验组骨密度、骨体积分数均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),两组骨小梁厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后26周,实验组骨密度显著高于对照组(P<0.05),两组骨体积分数、骨小梁厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新型可塑形骨填充材料具有良好的生物安全性及骨诱导活性,是一种良好的骨填充材料。 Objective To prepare a new plastic bone filler material with adhesive carrier and matrix particles derived from human bone,and evaluate its safety and osteoinductive ability through animal tests.Methods The human long bones donated voluntarily were prepared into decalcified bone matrix(DBM)by crushing,cleaning,and demineralization,and then the DBM was prepared into bone matrix gelatin(BMG)by warm bath method,and the BMG and DBM were mixed to prepare the experimental group’s plastic bone filler material;DBM was used as control group.Fifteen healthy male thymus-free nude mice aged 6-9 weeks were used to prepare intermuscular space between gluteus medius and gluteus maximus muscles,and all of them were implanted with experimental group materials.The animals were sacrificed at 1,4,and 6 weeks after operation,and the ectopic osteogenic effect was evaluated by HE staining.Eight 9-month-old Japanese large-ear rabbits were selected to prepare 6-mm-diameter defects at the condyles of both hind legs,and the left and right sides were filled with the materials of the experimental group and the control group respectively.The animals were sacrificed at 12 and 26 weeks after operation,and the effect of bone defect repair were evaluated by Micro-CT and HE staining.Results In ectopic osteogenesis experiment,HE staining showed that a large number of chondrocytes could be observed at 1 week after operation,and obvious newly formed cartilage tissue could be observed at 4 and 6 weeks after operation.For the rabbit condyle bone filling experiment,HE staining showed that at 12 weeks after operation,part of the materials were absorbed,and new cartilage could be observed in both experimental and control groups;at 26 weeks after operation,the most of the materials were absorbed,and large amount of new bone could be observed in the 2 groups,while new bone unit structure could be observed in the experimental group.Micro-CT observation showed that the bone formation rate and area of the experimental group were better than those of the control group.The measurement of bone morphometric parameters showed that the parameters at 26 weeks after operation in both groups were significantly higher than those at 12 weeks after operation(P<0.05).At 12 weeks after operation,the bone mineral density and bone volume fraction in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the two groups in trabecular thickness(P>0.05).At 26 weeks after operation,the bone mineral density of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in bone volume fraction and trabecular thickness between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The new plastic bone filler material is an excellent bone filler material with good biosafety and osteoinductive activity.
作者 李晶 任晓琦 乔玮 石浩 杨婷 马绍英 李宝兴 赵亚平 LI Jing;REN Xiaoqi;QIAO Wei;SHI Hao;YANG Ting;MA Shaoying;LI Baoxing;ZHAO Yaping(Biomaterial R&D Center of China Institute for Radiation Protection,Shanxi Osteorad Biomaterial Co.,Ltd,Taiyuan Shanxi,030006,P.R.China)
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第3期302-307,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 可塑形骨填充材料 脱钙骨基质 骨基质明胶 骨诱导 Plastic bone filler material demineralized bone matrix bone matrix gelatin osteoinduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献138

  • 1江捍平,王大平,阮建明,朱伟民.纳米羟基磷灰石人工骨的生物相容性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(10):1477-1480. 被引量:26
  • 2牛泽清,赵勇.实验动物在免疫学研究领域中的应用[J].实验动物科学与管理,2005,22(3):41-44. 被引量:8
  • 3井燕,李良,李毅,陈孟诗,吴文超,陈槐卿,刘小菁.力学应变对大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞增殖和成骨分化能力的影响[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2006,23(3):542-545. 被引量:10
  • 4李强,孙正义,严冬雪,刘文忠,姚新德.脱钙骨基质材料的生物学表现:降解性能、孔隙率及其黏附性能特征[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(31):6121-6124. 被引量:17
  • 5Durham SR, McComb JG, Levy ML. Correction of large (>25 cm(2)) cranial defects with "reinforced" hydroxyapatite cement: technique and complications. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52 (4): 842-845.
  • 6Baroth S, Bourges X, Goyenvalle E, et al. Injectable biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramic: The HYDROS concept. Biomed Mater Eng, 2009, 19(1): 71-76.
  • 7Babbush CA. Histologic evaluation of human biopsies after dental augmentation with a demineralized bone matrix putty. Implant Dent, 2003, 12(4): 325-332.
  • 8Yee AJ, Bae HW, Friess D, et al. Augmentation of rabbit posterolateral spondylodesis using a novel demineralized bone matrix-hyaluronan putty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(21): 2435-2440.
  • 9Pietrzak WS, Perns SV, Keyes J, et al. Demineralized bone matrix graft: a scientific and clinical case study assessment. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2005, 44(5): 345-353.
  • 10Wildemann B, Kadow-Romacker A, Haas NP, et al. Quantification of various growth factors in different demineralized bone matrix preparations. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2007, 81(2): 437-442.

共引文献24

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部