期刊文献+

基于支付一体化的地铁联程票价方案选择行为研究

Research on selection behavior of metro intermodal fare package based on payment integration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “地铁+共享出行”成为城市出行的重要组成方式,共享出行成为公交联程出行的有效补充.针对“地铁+共享出行”联程票制票价研究的不足,围绕地铁联程出行群体,提出基于支付一体化理念的地铁联程票价方案.划分多距离出行场景,结合意向调查数据,建立巢式Logit模型,分析各属性变量对地铁联程出行群体选择地铁联程票价方案的影响程度,研究结果表明:中低收入人群拒绝支付高额票价,倾向于选择折扣力度适中、乘坐次数适中的低价票种,具备通勤需求且频率稳定的通勤人群,购入月票的概率显著高于其他用户;中距离联程出行用户对地铁联程票价优惠敏感性高于短距离联程出行群体.研究结果对促进城市公共交通与共享交通协同运营,为联程出行票价精细化优惠策略实施提供建议. “Metro + Shared Travel” has become an important component of urban transportation,and shared travel has become an effective supplement to public transport intermodal travel.To address the shortcomings of the study on the “Metro+Shared Travel” intermodal fares,a metro intermodal fare package based on the concept of payment integration is proposed around the group of metro travelers.To delineate multi-distance travel scenarios,and combine intention survey data,a nested Logit model is developed to analyze the influence of each attribute on the choice of the combined metro fare package by the group.The results show that the low-and middle-income groups refuse to pay high fares and tend to choose low fares with moderate discounts and a moderate number of rides.Commuters with stable commuting needs are significantly more likely to purchase a monthly pass than other users.Medium-distance commuters are more sensitive to discounted metro fares than short-distance commuters.The results of this study provide references for the coordinated operation of urban public transportation and shared transportation,and the refinement of fare discount strategy for intermodal travel.
作者 陈茜 张玥妍 刘爱华 CHEN Qian;ZHANG Yueyan;LIU Aihua(School of Transportation,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China;Zhejiang Highway Information Engineering Technology Co.,Ltd.,Hangzhou 310000,China;Qingdao Hisense Network Technology Company,Qingdao Shandong 266071,China)
出处 《北京交通大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期98-105,共8页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY
基金 国家重点研发计划(2020YFB1600500)。
关键词 城市交通 地铁联程出行人群 地铁联程票价方案 意向调查 巢式LOGIT模型 urban transportation metro transfer passengers metro intermodal fare package stated preference survey nested Logit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1徐慧亮.基于UTAUT模型的共享汽车使用意愿研究[J].产业与科技论坛,2019,0(20):93-95. 被引量:3
  • 2Desalvo J S, Huq M. Mode choice, commuting cost, and urban household behavior [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2005, 45 : 493.
  • 3Lerman S R. Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1976, 610: 6.
  • 4Brown B. Modal choice, location demand, and income [J].Journal of Urban Economics, 1986, 20.. 128.
  • 5Bhat C R, Guo J Y. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2004, 38(2) : 147.
  • 6Bekhor S, Prashker J N. GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 42(3), 2008: 243.
  • 7Kenneth A Small. Approximate generalized extreme value models of discrete choice [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 62 (2), 1994: 351.
  • 8Joffre Swait. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models [J] Transportation Research Part B, 35(7), 2001, 643.
  • 9Chandra R Bhat. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 32(6), 1998, 361.
  • 10Amaya V, Aisling R F. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2009, 43.. 401.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部