期刊文献+

博物教育的建设性蕴涵——论新教育范式的演进逻辑 被引量:4

Constructive Implications of BOWU Education:On the Evolution Logic of a New Educational Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 古往今来,众多教育模式主要归属于两种范式:古典博物范式和数理范式。在古代,博物学占据主导地位,绝大多数教育都是古典博物范式教育;近代以来,数理范式教育逐渐占据主导地位,很多教育模式,如通识教育、素质教育、STEM/STEAM教育,都属于数理范式教育。在原有范式的发展过程中不同程度地蕴涵着一种新范式——“博物教育”——出现的可能。在现代博物传统和数理传统相兼容互动的背景下,基于博物论和认知科学的发展,新博物教育被提出来,它是一种具有建设性价值的整全性的新教育范式,有其自身的演进逻辑。 From ancient to modern times,many educational models mainly belong to two paradigms:classical natural history paradigm and mathematical paradigm.In ancient times,natural history was dominant,and most educational models belonged to classical natural history education.Since modern times,mathematical paradigm has gradually taken a dominant position.Many educational models,such as general education,quality education and STEM/STEAM education,belong to mathematical paradigm.During the development of original paradigms,there is a possibility of a new paradigm-BOWU education.Under the background of compatible interaction between modern natural history tradition and mathematical tradition,based on the de-velopment of natural history theory and cognitive science,new BOWU education is put forward.It is a constructive and comprehensive new educational paradigm with its own evolution logic.
作者 王琦 丁宏伟 WANG Qi;DING Hong-wei(College of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China;Faculty of Buddhist Studies,Lumbini Buddhist University,Lumbini,Nepal)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第2期125-131,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“波爱修斯哲学著作编译暨研究”(18BZX087) “当代博物教育课程与教材建设研究”(2019BW001)。.
关键词 博物 具身认知 博物教育 natural history embodied cognition BOWU education
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘啸霆.对科学与宗教关系的知识社会学分析[J].河北学刊,2007,27(3):43-48. 被引量:7
  • 2秦炜炜.全球化时代美国教育的STEM战略[J].教育技术资讯,2007(10).
  • 3马克思.《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》(十一),《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷,人民出版社1995年版,第54-57页.
  • 4刘华杰《新博物学》,《文汇报》2003年8月13日.
  • 5Asghar, A. , Ellington,R. , Rice, E. , et al. (2012). Support- ing Stem Education in secondary science contexts [ J ]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2) : 4.
  • 6Bruning, R. H. , Schraw, J. G. , Norby, M. M. & Ronning, R. R. ( 2004 ) Cognitive psychology and instruction [ M ]. Columbus, OH : Pearson.
  • 7Byhee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 version[ J:. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70( 1 ) :30-35.
  • 8Frykholm J, Glasson G. (2005). Connecting science and mathe- matics instruction: pedagogical context knowledge for teachers [ J ]. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3): 127-141.
  • 9Herschbach D. R. (2011 ). The stem initiative: constraints and challenges. [J]. Journal of Stem Teacher Education, 48( 1 ) : 96-122.
  • 10Hurd, P. D. (1975) Science,Technology, and Society: New Coals for Interdisciplinary Science Teaching [ J ]. Science Teacher, 42 (2) : 27-30.

共引文献1040

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部