期刊文献+

服从会带来好绩效吗?心理权利感的中介作用及沟通开放性的调节作用

Can Obedience Lead to Good Performance?The Mediating Role of Psychological Entitlement and the Moderating Role of Communication Transparency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 服从被认为能够较好地提高组织的运作效率,因而许多企业非常强调员工的服从,但服从所带来的消极影响同样也不容忽视。基于自我决定理论,文章采用问卷调查法,利用两个时间点收集了88名领导以及594名员工的配对数据,探讨了员工表现出服从行为后可能产生的消极影响。研究发现:员工表现出服从行为后,会产生心理权利感;服从行为通过心理权利感降低了员工的任务绩效;团队的沟通开放性调节了服从行为与心理权利感之间的关系,即沟通开放性较高时,服从行为对心理权利感的正向影响减弱;同时,沟通开放性也调节了服从行为通过心理权利感影响任务绩效的中介效应。研究结论扩展了对员工服从行为消极影响的认识,同时也为干预这一消极影响提供了理论支持。 As obedience is considered to be able to facilitate coordination and operational efficiency,many companies stress the obedience of employees.However,we cannot ignore the negative impacts of obedience.Based on the self-determination theory,this study empirically examines the negative impacts of obedience behavior.By using multi-phase&multi-level data from 594 employees in 88 teams,we determine that employees􀆳obedience behavior can affect task performance negatively and indirectly via psychological entitlement.Furthermore,communication transparency weakens the positive relationship between obedience behavior and psychological entitlement.We also find communication transparency can moderate the indirect effect of obedience behavior on task performance through psychological entitlement.Under conditions of low communication transparency,facilitations in psychological entitlement can explain why obedience behavior would result in low task performance.These findings expand the understanding of the negative impacts of employees􀆳obedience behavior,and also provide theoretical support for intervening in this negative impact.
作者 吴坤津 宋一晓 WU Kunjin;SONG Yixiao(School of Human Resource,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China)
出处 《商业经济与管理》 北大核心 2023年第1期15-25,共11页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目“阳儒阴法:家长式人力资源管理对员工工作结果的多路径影响研究”(71902037) 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金区域联合基金—青年基金项目“绿色人力资源管理实践的影响因素及其积极效用:一项跨层次追踪研究”(2019A1515110683)。
关键词 服从行为 心理权利感 任务绩效 沟通开放性 obedience psychological entitlement task performance communication transparency
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献96

  • 1龙立荣,刘亚.组织不公正及其效果研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593. 被引量:60
  • 2王辉,刘雪峰.领导—部属交换对员工绩效和组织承诺的影响[J].经济科学,2005(2):94-101. 被引量:49
  • 3暴占光,张向葵.自我决定认知动机理论研究概述[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(6):141-146. 被引量:110
  • 4于海波,方俐洛,凌文辁,郑晓明.组织信任对员工态度和离职意向、组织财务绩效的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):311-320. 被引量:45
  • 5GRAEN G B,UHL-BIEN M.Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership:Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years:Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective[J].Leadership Quarterly,1995,6(2):219-247.
  • 6CHEN X P,FARH J L.The Effectiveness of Transactional and Transformational Leader Behaviors in Chinese Organizations:Evidence from Taiwan[C] //Chicago:The Academy of Management Annual Meeting,1999.
  • 7HUI C,LAW K S,CHEN Z X A.Structural Equation Model of the Effects of Negative Affectivity,Leader-Member Exchange and Perceived Job Mobility on In-Role and Extra-Role Performance:A Chinese Case[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proeesses,1999,77(1):3-21.
  • 8BHAL K T,ANSARI M A.Leader-Member Exchange-Subordinate Outcomes Relationship:Role of Voice and Justice[J].Leadership & Organization Development Journal,2006,28(1):20-35.
  • 9MASTERSON S S,LEWIS K,GOLDMAN B M,et al.Integrating Justice and Social Exchange:The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships[J].Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(4):738-748.
  • 10SCANDURA T A.Rethinking Leader-Member Exchange:An Organizational Justice Perspective[J].Leadership Quarterly,1999,25(6):25-41.

共引文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部