对《刑诉解释》第175条的理解与适用

The Understanding and Application of Article 175 of Criminal Prosecution Interpretation

《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼>的解释》(以下简称《刑诉解释》)中将第175条的“不予受理”变更为“一般不予受理”。同年6月,首例依据该解释在刑事附带民事诉讼中支持被害人赔偿精神损害诉请的案例随之而来。本次修改了两个字,在理论上如何判断理解、实践中如何具体操作等问题都还亟待解决。本文的重点是以《刑诉解释》第175条为中心,论证《刑诉解释》第175条的实践必要性及现实可行性,分析立法者逐渐放开限制精神损害赔偿范围的原因,并就实践如何适用进行设计探索。

Supreme Law Interpretation[2021]No.1 changed Article 175 of the Criminal Procedure Interpretation from"inadmissible"to"generally inadmissible".In June of the same year,the first case of supporting victim compensation in a criminal incidental civil lawsuit based on this interpretation cases of mental damage claims followed.Due to the revision of two words,problems such as how to judge and understand in theory and specific operations in practice still need to be solved urgently.The focus of this paper is to focus on Article 175 of the Interpretation of Criminal Procedure,to demonstrate the practical necessity and practical feasibility of Article 175 of the Interpretation of Criminal Procedure,to analyze the reasons why legislators gradually liberalize the scope of compensation for mental damage,and to discuss how practice applies to design exploration.