期刊文献+

平台的“封印”:社交网络内容封闭性传导——基于格兰杰因果分析 被引量:1

“Seal”of Platform:Conduction of Content Closure in Social Network—Based on Granger Causality Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】社交网络内容趋于封闭性和同质化的问题已得到部分研究的证实,但关于内容封闭性是否以及如何被传导的问题,现有分析还不够充分。基于微博平台的样本,对全局内容封闭性的引发和设置问题进行了检验和探究。【设计/方法】通过格兰杰因果分析,发现社交网络中头部内容封闭性是全局内容封闭性的格兰杰原因,而反之不成立,即头部内容的封闭可以引发全局内容的封闭。其中的作用机制可能和内容的热度有关:内容热度越高,其引发全局各类内容比例发生变化的能力越强,从而触发全局封闭性的可能越大。【结论/发现】社交网络的全局内容受外力引导时可能趋于封闭的现象,这是对社交网络内容封闭性问题的深入。在现实层面,对于规避和调控由部分热门内容导致的社交网络封闭性具有参考价值。 [Purpose/Significance]The tendency of social network content to be homogeneous has been partially confirmed by some studies,but the analysis is inadequate about whether and how the closure of content is conducted.Based on the sample of Weibo platform,this study explores the issue about how to trigger and set the overall closure of content.[Design/Methodology]Through Granger Causality Test,the results show that in social network,the closure of top content can cause and trigger the closure of overall content,but not vice versa.The mechanism may be related to the popularity of content:the higher the popularity of content,the stronger its ability to cause changes in the proportion of various types of content,and thus the greater the possibility to trigger the overall closure.[Conclusions/Findings]The findings reveal the phenomenon that overall content may tend to be closed under the control of external force,which is a deeper insight into the problem of content closure in social network.At a practical level,this paper has reference value for avoiding and regulating the closed social network caused by some popular content.
作者 徐翔 龙婧 XU Xiang;LONG Jing(Tongji University,Shanghai 200092 China)
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2023年第2期12-20,共9页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究项目(23692110600)。
关键词 社交网络 内容封闭性 内容传导 格兰杰因果分析 social network content closure content conduct Granger Causality Test
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献56

  • 1苏宏元.新闻文体的基本特征[J].江苏社会科学,1999(1):146-149. 被引量:6
  • 2杜秀芳.国外外群体同质性效应研究述评[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):380-382. 被引量:7
  • 3霍尔,S.表征:文化表象与意指实践[M].徐亮,陆兴华,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 4费尔克拉夫.话语与社会变迁[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003..
  • 5Mislove A., Marcon M., Gummadi K. P., Druschel P., Bhattacharjee B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks [C]//Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIG- COMM conference on internet measurement. New York: ACM, 2007:29-42.
  • 6Borge-Holthoefer J., Rivero A., Garcia I., et al. Struc- tural and Dynamical Patterns on Online Social Net- works: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a Case Study [J]. Plos One, 2011, 6(8): 238823.
  • 7Williamson D. A. The rush to social networks [EB/ OL].http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R= 10069 10, 2009-10-09.
  • 8S. Bausch S. M. Nielsen Online Report [EB/OL]. http:// www.nielsen.com, 2009-11-15.
  • 9Kwak H., Lee C., Park H., Moon S. What is twitter, a social network or a news media?[C}// Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, 2010:591-600.
  • 10Cheung C. M. K., Chiu P. Y., Matthew K. O. L. Online social networks: Why do students use facebook [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(4): 1337-1343.

共引文献89

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部