学科自律视域下中国当代文论建设的检视与启迪——以三个关键词为核心考察

Inspection and Enlightenment of Chinese Contemporary Literary Theory Construction from the Perspective of Disciplinary Self-Discipline——With Three Key Words as the Core Inspection

中国当代文论的学科建设具有广阔的开放性和视野纵深,交织着古与今的衔接、中与西的碰撞、文学“内”与“外”的融合,如古今断裂的“失语症”、中西碰撞的“变异学”,学科内外的“强制阐释”等。如何从知识生产合法性的视域审视这些概念,对中国当代文论的学科建设具有重要的启迪意义。学科自律是确保学科知识生产合法性的重要前提。以学科自律的眼光打量在中国当代文论中出现的“失语症”“变异学”“强制阐释”三个关键词是考察中国文论生成机制的重要切入口。失语症是中国古代文论在当代失去学术话语规则的问题,变异学是如何把西方文论中国化的问题,强制阐释是文学意义空间的场外洞见方法是否合理的问题。

The discipline construction of Chinese contemporary literary theory has a broad openness and a depth of vision, intertwined with the connection between the past and the present. It is the collision between China and the West, and the fusion of “inside” and “outside” of literature, such as the “aphasia” that breaks between ancient and modern, “variation studies” of the collision between China and the West, “forced interpretation” inside and outside the discipline, etc. How to examine these concepts from the perspective of the legitimacy of knowledge production is of great enlightening significance to the discipline construction of contemporary Chinese literary theory. Disciplinary self-discipline is an important prerequisite to ensure the legitimacy of discipline knowledge production. Looking at the three key words of “aphasia”, “variation” and “forced interpretation” in contemporary Chinese literary theory from the perspective of disciplinary self-discipline is an important entry point to investigate the generation mechanism of Chinese literary theory. “Aphasia”is faced with the problem that ancient Chinese literary theory loses the rules of academic discourse in contemporary times, the problem of “variation” is how to sinicize Western literary theory, and the problem of “forced interpretation” is the question of whether the method of off-site insight into the space of literary meaning is reasonable.