摘要
采用SEC一致性分析模型,以人教版、北师大版初中数学教材中“方程与不等式”内容的习题和《义务教育数学课程标准(2022年版)》为研究对象进行一致性分析.研究发现:人教版和北师大版的“方程与不等式”习题与数学课程标准“方程与不等式”内容的一致性较弱;在内容主题上,两版教材习题关于“方程与不等式的相关性质”的题量都较少;在认知水平上,两版教材习题考查水平均高于课程标准的要求.基于此,建议教材习题编写过程中应加强教材习题与课程标准的一致性,以使教材习题与课程标准更加契合,精准把控方向,落实“双减”政策要求.
Using SEC consistency analysis model,the"equations and inequalities"exercises in junior high school mathematics text books of the People's Education edition and the Beijing Nor-mal University edition and the Mathematics Curriculum Standards for Com pulsory Education(2022 Edition)were taken as the research objects for consistency analysis.The results show that the"equation and inequality"exercises in the People's Education Press edition and Beijing Normal University edition are weakly consistent with the"equation and inequality"content in mathematics curriculum standards.In terms of content theme,the textbook exercises of the two editions have fewer questions about"the related properties of equations and inequalities";in terms of cognitive level,the examination level of the textbook exercises in each edition is higher than the require-ments of the curriculum standards.Based on this,it is recommended that the consistency be-tween textbook exercises and curriculum standards should be strengthened during the compilation of textbook exercises,so as to make the exercises more compatible with curriculum standards,thus accurately control the direction,and implement the policy requirements of"double reduc-tion".
作者
吴凤桥
冯芙蓉
WU Feng-qiao;FENG Fu-rong(School of Mathematical Sciences,Guizhou Normal University,Gui'an New District Guizhou 550025)
出处
《辽宁师专学报(自然科学版)》
2023年第1期4-9,共6页
Journal of Liaoning Normal College(Natural Science Edition)
基金
贵州师范大学课程思政示范项目(2022KCSZ006)
贵州省教育科学规划课题一般课题(2020B172)。
关键词
课程标准
初中数学
教材习题
一致性
curriculum standards
junior high school mathematics
textbook exercises
con-sistency