摘要
采用内容分析法,对所抽样的400篇教育学硕士学位论文中的文献综述规范性问题进行探讨。研究发现:研究述评整体水平偏低,存在着不重视研究综述、未在硕士学位论文中单列这个部分并且其内容呈现较为简略、不深入等情况;“有无国外已有研究”在不同的高校及不同的二级学科上存在显著差异;“有无研究述评”及“研究述评程度”在学科因素上存在显著差异。提高教育学硕士学位论文文献综述的质量需要高质量的中外文献“分类与梳理”“筛选与呈现”“批判与评述”。
The normative problems of literature review in 400 theses of master's degree in pedagogy are discussed in this study by content analysis method.The findings are as follows:the overall level of research review is low,some of them do not pay attention to research review,do not list this part in the master's thesis and also its content is brief and not in-depth.There are significant differences in different universities and different secondary disciplines in terms of"whether there is existing research abroad".There are significant differences in the subject factors of"research review or not"and"research review degree".To improve the quality of literature review of master's degree thesis in pedagogy obviously requires high-quality"classification and sorting","screening and presentation","criticism and review"of the Chinese and foreign literature.
出处
《煤炭高等教育》
2022年第6期14-22,共9页
Meitan Higher Education
基金
2022年江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目“教育学硕士生学位论文写作困境分析及对策研究”(KYCX22_1435)。
关键词
硕士学位论文
文献综述
教育学一级学科
内容分析法
master dissertations
literature review
pedagogy as the first level discipline
content analysis method