摘要
检察机关开展行政争议实质性化解工作取得显著的成绩的同时也面临了诸多问题,包括衡量标准不统一、检察调解协议有待保障落实、检察调解制度构建存疑等困境。在总结最高人民检察院12个典型案例经验的基础上,对行政争议实质性化解的检察调解实践提出了加大制度约束与裁量基准公布、保障检察调解后续程序公开透明、构建多元检察调解路径等建议,以促进形式法治与实质法治的统一,避免“程序空转”,推进案结事了。
While the procuratorial organs have made remarkable achievements in the substantive resolution of administrative disputes,they also face many problems,including the difficulties of inconsistent measurement standards,the pending implementation of the procuratorial mediation agreement and the doubtful construction of the procuratorial mediation system.On the basis of summarizing the experience of 12 typical cases of the Supreme People's Procuratorate,this paper puts forward some suggestions on the practice of procuratorial mediation in substantive resolution of administrative disputes,such as increasing institutional constraints and releasing discretionary benchmark,guaranteeing the open and transparent follow-up procedures of procuratorial mediation,and constructing multiple paths of procuratorial mediation,so as to promote the unification of formal and substantive rule of law,avoid"idling procedures",and promote the conclusion of cases.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2023年第1期83-92,共10页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金
2023年度研究生“创新之星”项目“行政争议实质性化解的检察调解范式”资助的研究成果,项目编号:2023CXZX-773。
关键词
行政争议实质性化解
行政检察调解
典型案例
substantive resolution of administrative disputes
administrative procuratorial mediation
typical cases