期刊文献+

道德主体性与伦理他者性的融合:儒家伦理思想的德育价值转化 被引量:2

The Fusion of Moral Subjectivity and Ethical Otherness:the Transformation of Moral Education Value of Confucian Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒家伦理思想秉持道德主体性与伦理他者性一体融合的价值立场。道德主体性表现为内在超越与刚健有为;伦理他者性体现为主体间伦理互系共在、主体对社群的使命与责任担承;道德主体性与伦理他者性的一体融合即内圣与外王在个体道德生命建构中的伦理融化与统摄守一,这一伦理设计有效规避了主体的“单子式”僭越、主体间的伦理冲突以及主体与社群间的价值裂解。在廓清儒家伦理思想的历史局限性并保持必要的文化警惕前提下,儒家道德主体性与伦理他者性一体融合的伦理思想为当代德育理论与实践提供了双重价值参鉴。在理论理性上,当代德育首先应致力于受教育者道德主体性的生成与发展,培育其他者性伦理格局与使命自觉,最终实现道德主体性与伦理他者性的一体融合;在实践理性上,当代德育要注重道德体验与伦理实践的方法与路径。 The Confucian ethical thought upholds the value position of the integration of moral subjectivity and ethical otherness.Moral subjectivity is manifested as inner transcendence and vigorous and promising.The otherness of ethics is embodied in the mutual relationship and co-existence of ethics among subjects,and the mission and responsibility of subjects to the community;The integration of moral subjectivity and ethical otherness is the ethical fusion and unity of inner sage and outer king in the construction of individual moral life.This ethical design effectively avoids the“single”transgression of the subject,the ethical conflict between the subjects and the value splitting between the subject and the community.On the premise of clarifying the historical limitations of Confucian ethics and maintaining necessary cultural vigilance,the ethical thought of the integration of Confucian moral subjectivity and ethical otherness provides a double value reference for contemporary moral education theory and practice.Theoretically,contemporary moral education should first focus on the generation and development of the moral subjectivity of the educated,and then cultivate the ethical pattern and mission consciousness of other people.Finally,the integration of moral subjectivity and ethical otherness will be realized;In practical reason,contemporary moral education should pay attention to the methods of moral experience and ethical practice.
作者 崔振成 李志前 Cui Zhencheng;Li Zhiqian(Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China)
出处 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2023年第1期151-156,共6页 Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2019BJY013) 河南省教育科学研究重大招标课题(2021JKZB05) 河南省高等教育教学改革项目(2019SJGLX246)。
关键词 道德主体性与伦理他者性 儒家伦理 德育价值转化 moral subjectivity and ethical otherness Confucian ethics transformation of moral education value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献84

  • 1JurgenHabermas, A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997, p. 92.
  • 2Jurgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationality of Society, trans, by Thomas McCarthy, Boston& Beacon Press, 1984, pp. 157ff.
  • 3Immanuel Kant, Ethical Philosophy: Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. James W. Ellington, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1994, pp. 421, 429.
  • 4Jurgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen with an Introduction by Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995, p. 203.
  • 5Jurgen Habermas, Die Postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays, Frankfurt a/M : Suhrkamp, 1998, p. 231.
  • 6Thomas McCarthy, " Translator's Introduction ", in Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1984, p. viii.
  • 7Jurgen Habermas, "A Genealogical Analysis of the Cognitive Content of Morality", in The Inclusion of the Other, C. Cronin and P. Degreiff (eds.), Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1998, p. 42.
  • 8Jurgen Habermas, Reconciliation through the Public use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 92, No. 3, March, 1995, pp. 117-118.
  • 9[德]哈贝马斯.交往行为理论(第一卷)[M].曹卫东,译.上海:世纪出版集团、上海人民出版社,2004:275.
  • 10Cf. , Albrecht Wellmer, Ethik und Dialog: Elemente des moralischen Urteils bei Kant und in der Disleursethik , Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986, p. 63.

共引文献33

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部