期刊文献+

重复经颅刺激联合艾司西酞普兰治疗伴躯体症状抑郁症的临床效果 被引量:1

Clinical effect of repeated transcranial stimulation combined with Escitalopram in the treatment of depression with somatic symptoms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨重复经颅刺激(rTMS)联合艾司西酞普兰治疗伴躯体症状抑郁症的临床效果。方法选择2020年5月至2021年12月在吉安市第三人民医院接受治疗的92例伴躯体症状抑郁症患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(46例)和试验组(46例),对照组脱落5例,最终对照组41例,试验组46例。对照组采用艾司西酞普兰治疗,试验组采用r TMS联合艾司西酞普兰治疗,疗程8周。比较两组患者的临床疗效、汉密尔顿抑郁量表-24(HAMD-24)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)及不良反应。结果治疗8周后,两组患者的总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组治疗2、4、8周的HAMA评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组治疗6周的评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组治疗2、4、6、8周的HAMD-24评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论艾司西酞普兰联合r TMS治疗伴躯体症状抑郁症的疗效及安全性优于单用艾司西酞普兰。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of repeated transcranial stimulation(rTMS)combined with Escitalopram in the treatment of depression with somatic symptoms.Methods A total of 92 patients with depression with physical symptoms who received treatment in Ji'an Third People's Hospital from May 2020 to December 2021 were selected as the research objects.According to the method of random number table,they were divided into control group(46 cases)and experimental group(46 cases),with 5 cases of detachment in the control group,41 cases in the final control group and 46 cases in the experimental group.The control group was treated with escitalopram,and the experimental group was treated with rTMS combined with Escitalopram,for 8 weeks.The clinical efficacy,Hamilton depression scale-24(HAMD-24),Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA)and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared.Results After 8 weeks of treatment,there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups(P>0.05).HAMA scores of experimental group at 2,4 and 8 weeks were lower than those of control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in the scores of the two groups after 6 weeks of treatment(P>0.05).HAMD-24 scores of experimental group at 2,4,6 and 8 weeks were lower than those of control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The efficacy and safety of Escitalopram combined with rTMS in the treatment of depression with physical symptoms are superior to Escitalopram alone.
作者 刘翔 刘传健 邹海云 张秀娟 万爱兰 LIU Xiang;LIU Chuanjian;ZOU Haiyun;ZHANG Xiujuan;WAN Ailan(Department of Psychology,Ji'an Third People's Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Ji'an343000,China;Department of Psychosomatic,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Jiangxi Province,Nanchang330006,China)
出处 《中国当代医药》 CAS 2023年第9期55-58,共4页 China Modern Medicine
基金 江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(20204847)。
关键词 重复经颅磁刺激 艾司西酞普兰 躯体症状 抑郁症 临床效果 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Escitalopram Somatic symptoms Depression Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献68

  • 1中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南撰写组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2010[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2010,2(4):50-59. 被引量:1817
  • 2李双,郐凤敏,王苏平.经颅磁刺激辅助治疗抑郁症的效果分析[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(20):216-216. 被引量:4
  • 3刘贤臣,唐茂芹,胡蕾,王爱祯,吴宏新,赵贵芳,高春霓,李万顺.匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度和效度研究[J].中华精神科杂志,1996,29(2):103-107. 被引量:3364
  • 4朱熊兆,罗伏生,姚树桥,Randy P.Auerbach,JohnR.Z.Abela.认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):121-124. 被引量:251
  • 5汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 6中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准.3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:75-78.
  • 7世界卫生组织总干事布伦特兰博士在1999年中国/世界卫生组织精神卫生高层研讨会上的讲话.中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14:6-8.
  • 8汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定童表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:507-512.
  • 9Lecrubier Y. Widespread underrecognition and undertreatmentof anxiety and mood disorders: results from 3 European studies.J Clin Psychiatry, 2007, 68 Suppl 2:36-41.
  • 10Phillips MR, Zhang J, Shi Q, Song Z, Ding Z, Pang S, Li X,Zhang Y, Wang Z. Prevalence, treatment, and associateddisability of mental disorders in four provinces in China during2001-05: an epidemiological survey. Lancet, 2009, 373:2041 -2053.

共引文献149

同被引文献18

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部