数字治理对主体性的规训:样态表征、诱因探寻及纠治路径

The Discipline of Digital Governance on Subjectivity: Representation of Patterns, Exploration of Inducements and Correction Paths

当前,以数据为驱动因素推动治理现代化方兴未艾,数字治理已经广泛应用于供给服务、辅助决策、开放协同等各个方面。事实上,数字治理在引发治理革命的同时,也会遮蔽其触达群体的主体性,催生“技术难民”“屏幕官僚”“算数工人”等主体性异化困境。由此,基于马克思主义人的主体性理论审视数字治理引发的主体性异化困境具有十分重要的意义,研究发现数字治理本身内嵌着人的自为性衰减、能动性褪化、自主性偏离。因此,要从社会包容、素养提升和权利维护三个维度破解数字治理迷思中主体性异化难题,实现人的自由解放升越。

At present, the promotion of governance modernization with data as a driving factor is in the ascendant, and digital governance has been widely used in various aspects such as supply services, auxiliary decision-making, and open collaboration. In fact, while triggering a governance revolution, digital governance will also obscure the subjectivity of the groups it reaches, and give rise to some subjective alienation dilemmas such as “technical refugees”, “screen bureaucrats”, and “calculation workers”. Drawing from the above points,it is of great significance to examine the dilemma of subjectivity alienation caused by digital governance based on Marxist theory of subjectivity, and the study finds that digital governance itself is embedded with decay of human self-nature, fading of initiative and deviation of autonomy. Therefore, it is necessary to solve the problem of subjective alienation in the myth of digital governance from the three dimensions of social inclusion, literacy improvement and rights protection, thus realizing the liberation and elevation of human freedom.