基于CiteSpace的循证中医药研究知识图谱分析

Analysis of evidence-based TCM research knowledge graph based on CiteSpace

目的总结国内循证中医药研究领域的发展动态、热点变迁及前沿趋势。方法以中国知网收录的自数据库建库至2021年4月循证中医药领域相关文献为研究对象,采用CiteSpace 5.7.R2对纳入文献的作者、机构、关键词信息进行分析。结果共纳入文献2152篇,总结循证中医药领域研究可分为3个阶段:引入和传播阶段、快速发展阶段、深入研究阶段。主要发文研究机构有北京中医药大学、广州中医药大学、天津中医药大学等。从合作网络看,北京中医药大学和中国中医科学院处于核心位置。高产核心作者共有5位:刘建平、商洪才、张俊华、谢雁鸣、李幼平。大致形成3个较为主要的作者合作网络,分别是网络1:刘建平、费宇彤、廖星、陈薇;网络2:谢雁鸣、陈耀龙、杨克虎、李博;网络3:商洪才、张俊华、张伯礼、李幼平、王永炎。关键词聚类分析后共得到10个聚类,分别为:循证医学、meta-分析、质量评价、循证、方法学、真实世界研究、中医药防治、专家共识、系统综述、质量等。提取“中医药现代化”“中医药学”“临床疗效”等突变率较高的突变词。结论循证医学中医药领域核心研究机构群初步形成,相关研究主要围绕循证医学经典主题展开,“真实世界研究”和“专家共识”等研究主题可能是未来主要研究热点。

Objective To provide a systematic review of the development, changes in research focuses and cutting-edge trends in the field of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine(EBTCM) in China.Methods Research papers in the field of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine were collected from CNKI released since the establishment of the database until April 2021. The authors, institutions and keywords included in the papers were analyzed with CiteSpace5.7.R2.Results A total of 2,152 studies were included. It was revealed that the research in the field of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine can be divided into three stages: introduction and dissemination, rapid development and in-depth research. The major research institutions include Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and so on. From the perspective of cooperative networks, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences are in the core position. There are five core authors: Liu Jianping, Shang Hongcai, Zhang Junhua, Xie Yanming and Li Youping. Three major cooperation networks among the author were identified: network 1: Liu Jianping, Fei Yutong, Liao Xing, Chen Wei;network 2: Xie Yanming, Chen Yaolong, Yang Kehu, Li Bo;network 3: Shang Hongcai, Zhang Junhua, Zhang Boli, Li Youping, Wang Yongyan. Ten clusters were obtained in the cluster analysis, including evidence-based medicine, meta analysis, quality evaluation, evidence-based medicine, methodology, real-world studies, TCM therapies and preventative medicine, expert consensus, system review, and quality. The burst terms with the strongest citation bursts were discovered, such as “modernization of traditional Chinese medicine”, “traditional Chinese medicine”, “clinical efficacy”, etc.Conclusion This study finds that core research institution clusters in the field of evidence-based medicine have taken shape, and the studies in this field mainly focuses on those classic theme of evidence-based medicine, and the issues such as “real-world studies” and “expert consensus” may become the much focused areas in the future.