期刊文献+

以写作样本的文本指标评价读后续写题 被引量:4

Evaluating the Story Continuation Task through Text Indicators Generated from Writing Samples
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了更全面验证高考英语读后续写题的效度,本研究考察该题型所激发的语言样本是否实现了命题者的意图。为此,研究者收集了247名考生在一次模拟考中产出的应用文和续写样本,经语料分析获得155项文本指标,通过相关、主成分分析和回归分析,从中筛选出符合理论构念并能可靠预测作文成绩的4项指标,据此对应用文和续写文本进行比较。结果表明,续写任务能够促使考生产出更丰富的内容,使用更多低频单词和更复杂词语,符合命题机构和倡导者的预期。 In an attempt to validate the NMET story continuation task,the current study evaluates the extent to which the language samples elicited by the task live up to the expectation of the test developer.The writing samples of 247 test takers on a letter writing task and a continuation task in a NMET mock test were analyzed with corpus tools to generate 155 text indicators for each sample on each task.Correlational,principal component,and regression analyses were conducted to categorize the indicators and select a group of four indicators that matched the dimensions of the construct and consistently predicted the writing scores on both tasks.The two tasks were then compared in their mean values on the four indicators.The results showed that the continuation tasks had elicited richer content,more low-frequency words,and more complex word forms,to the expectation of the test developer and advocators.
作者 蔡宏文 CAI Hongwen(Center for Linguistics&Applied Linguistics,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,P.R.China)
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第2期245-258,共14页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“读后续写在我国高考英语中的应用研究”(21BYY125)的阶段性成果。
关键词 读后续写 写作样本 文本指标 效度验证 story continuation task writing sample text indicator construct validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献58

  • 1秦秀白.“体裁分析”概说[J].外国语,1997,20(6):9-16. 被引量:297
  • 2王初明,牛瑞英,郑小湘.以写促学——一项英语写作教学改革的试验[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(3):207-212. 被引量:959
  • 3教育部.普通高中英语课程标准(实验)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003..
  • 4Bachman, L. &A. Palmer. 2010. Language Assessment in the Real World : Developing Lan- guage Tests and Justifying Their Use [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 5Bloomfield. L. 1933. Language [M]. New York: Holt.
  • 6Bond, T. & C. Fox. 2001. Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences [M]. Mahwah, N.J.. Lawrence Erlbatma Associates.
  • 7Elder, C., U. Knoch, G. Barkhuizen&J. von Randow. 2005. Individual feedback to en- hance rater training: Does it work? [J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 2: 175-196.
  • 8Engelhard, G. 1992. The measurement of writing ability with a Many-Faceted Rasch Model [J]. Applied Measurement in Education 5: 171-191.
  • 9Knoch, U. 2011. Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to rating behav- ior: A longitudinal study [J]. Language Testing 28 :179-200.
  • 10Lado, R. 1961. Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language Tests [M]. London. Longman.

共引文献589

同被引文献70

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部