摘要
文章基于陕西省686份农户调查数据,采用OLS回归与Bootstrap方法实证分析收入质量及其分维度对农户主观幸福感的影响,检验社会地位在收入质量影响农户主观幸福感路径中的中介作用。结果表明,收入质量对农户主观幸福感具有正向影响,分维度中收入充足性、成长性与知识性对农户主观幸福感具有正向影响,其中,收入成长性正向影响效应最强,收入成本性对农户主观幸福感具有负向影响,收入结构性对农户主观幸福感影响不显著;社会地位在收入质量与农户主观幸福感之间发挥中介作用,中介效应占比多在30%以上;个体特征中年龄、婚姻、学历、农户是否为村干部对农户主观幸福感具有正向影响,家庭特征中人口规模对农户主观幸福感具有正向影响。基于上述实证结果,文章从提高农户收入质量与社会地位两个角度为相关部门增强农户主观幸福感提供政策借鉴。
Based on the survey data of 686 farmers in Shaanxi Province,this paper uses OLS regression and Bootstrap methods to empirically analyze the relationship between income quality and farmers’subjective well-being,and to test the intermediary role of social status between income quality and farmers’subjective well-being.The results are as follows.One the one hand,the income quality has a significant positive effect on farmers’subjective well-being,among which income adequacy and income growth have positive effect,and income growth have strong positive effects on farmers’subjective well-being,while income cost has a negative effect,and income structure has no significant effect.On the other hand,social status plays an intermediary role between income quality and farmers’subjective well-being,which accounts for more than 30%.The individual characteristics,such as age,marriage,education and whether the interviewees are village officials have a significant positive impact on the subjective well-being of farmers;while the family characteristics,such as the number of the family members has a significant positive impact on the subjective well-being of farmers.Based on the above empirical results,this paper proposes policy reference for relevant departments to enhance farmers’subjective well-being from two perspectives of improving their income quality and social status.
作者
姬琳雪
孔荣
Ji Linxue;Kong Rong(School of Economics and Management,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Yangling 712100,Shaanxi,China)
出处
《新疆农垦经济》
2023年第1期16-26,共11页
Xinjiang State Farms Economy
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目编号:71773094)
西北农林科技大学基本科研业务费人文社科项目资助计划(项目编号:2452021168)。
关键词
农户主观幸福感
收入质量
社会地位
中介作用
farmers’subjective well-being
income quality
social status
mediating effect