期刊文献+

论刑事附带民事诉讼禁止精神损害赔偿的例外 被引量:2

Exception to the prohibition of moral damages in criminal incidental civil litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《民法典》明确规定精神损害赔偿后,刑事附带民事诉讼完全禁止精神损害赔偿出现了松动,在司法解释上以“一般”加“例外”的形式允许被害人提出精神损害赔偿。立法上的突破,将刑事附带民事诉讼从服务于刑事诉讼的目的转向维护被害人的私权,保障刑事附带民事诉讼中民事诉讼的性质,带动部分法院已经允许刑事附带民事诉讼中提起精神损害赔偿。司法解释以及司法实务的转变需要对“例外”情形进行解释,进而扩大“例外”情形,最终实现完全允许刑事案件中提出精神损害赔偿。 After the Civil Code explicitly provides for compensation for moral damages,the complete prohibition of moral damages in criminal incidental civil litigation has been loosened and the judicial interpretation allows victims to file for moral damages in the form of“general”plus“exception”.The breakthrough in legislation has shifted the criminal incidental civil litigation from serving the purpose of criminal litigation to safeguard the private rights of the victims and protect the nature of civil litigation in criminal incidental civil litigation and some courts have allowed moral damages to be brought in criminal incidental civil litigation.The judicial interpretation and the transformation of judicial practice need to explain the“exception”circumstances and then expand the“exception”circumstances and finally achieve the full permission to bring moral damage compensation in criminal cases.
作者 张恒远 ZHNAG Hengyuan(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处 《江苏理工学院学报》 2023年第1期86-92,共7页 Journal of Jiangsu University of Technology
关键词 刑事附带民事诉讼 精神损害赔偿 民法典 诉权 criminal incidental civil litigation moral damage compensation civil code right of action
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献71

共引文献174

同被引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部