期刊文献+

基于工作重塑视角的变革型领导对员工变革支持行为的影响研究 被引量:6

The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Employees’Change Supportive Behavior:A Study from the Perspective of Job Crafting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于工作重塑理论,通过286位团队领导和858位下属的配对样本,探讨了变革型领导是否、如何以及何时影响员工变革支持行为,并使用多水平结构方程模型对研究假设进行了实证检验。研究结果表明:促进型和防御型工作重塑在变革型领导影响员工变革支持行为过程中起中介作用,团队竞争氛围对变革型领导与工作重塑的关系具有显著调节效应,即团队竞争氛围越高,变革型领导与促进型工作重塑的正向关系越强,变革型领导与防御型工作重塑的负向关系也越强。 Based on job crafting theory,this study investigates whether,how,and when transformational leadership affects employees’change supportive behavior.A paired sample of 286 team leaders and 858 subordinates was used to empirically test the hypothesis using a multi-level structural equation model.The results showed that promotion-oriented and prevention-oriented job crafting play a mediating role in the process of transformational leadership affecting employees’change supportive behavior.Additionally,the team competition climate has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between transformational leadership and job crafting.Specifically,the higher the team competition climate is,the stronger is the positive relationship between transformational and promotion-oriented job crafting.Furthermore,the negative relationship between transformational leadership and prevention-oriented job crafting is stronger.
作者 何国华 郑馨念 王雁飞 郭子生 朱瑜 HE Guohua;ZHENG Xinnian;WANG Yanfei;GUO Zisheng;ZHU Yu(Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,China;Universitéde Montréal,Montréal,Quebec Canada;South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,China;Jinan University,Guangzhou,China)
出处 《管理学报》 北大核心 2023年第3期378-388,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(72272053) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(22BGL126) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2022M713555)。
关键词 变革型领导 工作重塑 变革支持行为 团队竞争氛围 transformational leadership job crafting change supportive behavior team competition climate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献111

  • 1孔靓,李锡元,章发旺.包容型领导对员工主动性行为的影响:组织自尊与差错管理氛围的中介作用[J].管理评论,2020,0(2):232-243. 被引量:47
  • 2林颐宣.主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J].心理发展与教育,2020,0(1):103-112. 被引量:16
  • 3Armenakis, A. A, Bernerth, J. B, Pitts, J. P, & Walker, H. J. 2007, Organizational change recipients' beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Bebaviond Science, 43(4), 481-505.
  • 4Avey, J. B, Wemsing, T. S, & Luthans, F. 2008, Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. The JournM of Applied BehaviorM Science, 44(1), 48-70.
  • 5Bemerth, J. 2004, Expanding our understanding of the change message. Human Resource Development Review, 3(1), 36-52.
  • 6Bizzi, L, & Soda, G. 2011, The paradox of authentic selves and chameleons: Self-monitoring, perceived job autonomy and contextual performance. Bn'gsb Journal of Management, 22(2), 324-339.
  • 7Breaugh, J. A. (1989), The work autonomy scales: Additional validity evidence. Human Relations, 4201), 1033-1056.
  • 8Chawla, A, & Kevin, K. E. 2004, Predicting openness and commitment l change. eaderstffp and Orgam'zation Development Journd, 25(6), 485-498.
  • 9De Spiegelaere, S, van Gyes, G, De WiRe, H, Niesen, W, & van Hootegem, G. 2014, On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318-330.
  • 10Egan, T. M. 2005, Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: An examination of quantitative empirical research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 160-181.

共引文献83

同被引文献88

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部