“金课”标准下的大学英语建设及学生接受度研究

Research on Construction of College English and Students Acceptance Under“Golden Course”Standard

判定一门课程是“金课”还是“水课”不能仅凭刻板印象,要考虑课程的个性化因素,如任课教师的教学态度、授课水平、教学内容、教学设计及评价方式等。此外,学生对课程的反馈也是评价课程质量的重要指标。以大学英语后续课程“英语经典影片赏析”为例,以“两性一度”即高阶性、创新性、挑战度作为课程建设标准,采取多样化的教学活动设计进行为期16周的课程教学实践,并通过网络问卷的方式调查学生对课程“金课”标准的评价。结果显示:大多数学生对课程持肯定态度;教学质量和教学效果获得提升。

Judging a course a“water course”or a“golden course”cannot be drawn only based on stereotypes.The following individual factors should also be taken into account,such as the teacher s teaching attitude and competence,content of the course,course design and assessment.What s more,students evaluation is also an important factor to assess the quality of a course.Taking the follow-up course“Appreciation of English Classic Films”of college English as an example,the curriculum construction standard is high-level,innovative,and challenging.By adopting diverse teaching methods for 16 weeks,the teacher released an online questionnaire to collect students assessment of this course.The result shows that a vast majority of students hold positive attitudes to the course,and teaching quality and effectiveness is improved.