期刊文献+

既有砌体结构安全性评估的分项系数研究 被引量:2

Study on the partial safety assessment factors of existing masonry structures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 既有结构安全性评估是基于已知的结构信息,对结构是否能够承受预期荷载做出判断的过程;基于既有砌体结构抗力的材料性能、几何特征以及永久作用为确定量的基本假设,给出了适用于既有砌体结构安全性评估的极限状态表达式及其分项系数和安全性分级原则。结果表明,A类、B类和C类既有砌体结构安全性评估的分项系数可取值为:抗力分项系数γR取1.6(对应的材料分项系数γf为1.2);永久作用分项系数γG取1.0;对于可变作用分项系数γQ,A类构件取1.3,B类构件取1.4,C类构件取1.5。对于重要性系数γ0,可与《工程结构可靠性设计统一标准》(GB 50153—2008)保持一致;对于安全性分级标准,可与《民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准》(GB 50292—2015)保持一致。 The safety assessment of an existing structure determines whether the structure can survive the predicted load based on available structural information.According to the basic assumption that the material properties,geometric characteristics and permanent action are certain,the ultimate state expression,partial factors and safety grading principles of safety assessment of existing masonry structures were proposed.The results show that the partial safety assessment factors of existing masonry structures of classes A,B and C can be as follows.The partial resistance factor can be 1.6,equivalent to the partial material factor of 1.2.The partial permanent action factor can be 1.0.The variable action partial factors can be 1.3,1.4 and 1.5 for masonry structural members of classes A,B and C respectively.The important factors shall comply with Unified standard for reliability design of engineering structures(GB 50153—2008).The safety classification principles shall comply with Standard for appraisal of reliability of civil buildings(GB 50292—2015).
作者 吴乐乐 唐曹明 罗开海 黄世敏 吕大刚 关洪成 WU Lele;TANG Caoming;LUO Kaihai;HUANG Shimin;L Dagang;GUAN Hongcheng(China Academy of Building Research,Beijing 100013,China;Disaster Prevention Research Center,Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development,Beijing 100013,China;Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China;Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disaster of the Ministry of Industry andInformation Technology,School of Civil Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China)
出处 《四川建筑科学研究》 2023年第2期48-57,66,共11页 Sichuan Building Science
关键词 既有砌体结构 安全性评估 分项系数 重要性系数 安全性分级原则 existing masonry structures safety assessment partial factors important factors safety classification principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1顾祥林,许勇,张伟平.既有建筑结构构件的安全性分析[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(6):117-122. 被引量:32
  • 2欧进萍,段宇博,叶骏.等效随机静风荷载的模型及其参数确定[J].哈尔滨建筑工程学院学报,1994,27(2):1-8. 被引量:25
  • 3Yaacob Ibrahim. Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis [ J ]. Structural Safety, 1991 (9) :269-281.
  • 4Li C Q. A case study on the reliability analysis of deteriorating structures ,proceeding of the institution of civil engineers [J]. Structures and Buildings,1995,110(8):269-277.
  • 5GBJ68-84建筑结构设计统一标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1984.
  • 6GB50010-2010混凝土结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工程出版社,2011.
  • 7中华人民共和国建设部.GB50009-2001建筑结构荷载规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002..
  • 8The Institution of Structural Engineers. Appraisal of existing structures[M]. London, United Kingdom, 1980.
  • 9Comite Euro-Intemational du Beton. Assessment of concrete structures and design procedures for upgrading[M]. Bulletin d' Information No. 162, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1983.
  • 10Standard CSN 73 -0083 Czechoslovak code for the design and assessment of building structures subjected to reconstruction[S]. English Translation by Building Research Institute, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1986.

共引文献96

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部