社区居民自治与网格化管理有效衔接模式及其内在逻辑研究——基于三个全国社区治理和服务创新实验区的案例比较

Study on the Effective Connection Mode between Community Residents'Autonomy and Grid Management and Its Internal Logic——Based on the Case Comparison of Three National Community Governance and Service Innovation Experimental Areas

社区居民自治与网格化管理是社区治理体系的“一体两翼”,其有效衔接对加强和完善社区治理体系具有重要意义。然而实践中二者不仅有“失灵”困境,还存在不衔接问题。本研究以整体性治理理论为指导,搭建二者有效衔接模式的分析框架,并从三个国家级实验区创新案例入手,呈现且比较三者形成的有效衔接模式,揭示其内在逻辑。研究发现,围绕组织、人员、制度、功能四个衔接路径形成的不同组合方式与衔接程度,会形成不同衔接模式。基于此,三个实验区分别形成一体融合、双网共生、四维嵌入三个衔接模式,它们都以党建引领为衔接的轴心线,注重丰富和创新社区微自治组织与机制,遵循整体性治理理论逻辑,形成了四维度衔接、共生与嵌入、自治与网格双属性、系统集成与环环相扣等多重实践逻辑,同时遵循碎片化到整体性,再到“共同体化”的演进和价值逻辑。基于多种差异,可将它们划分为两种模式类型,即双向和单向衔接。这两类模式对摆脱社区治理碎片化,提升社区治理整体性都具有较好效能,而双向衔接模式还能为社区的“共同体化”提供引擎。本研究拓展了该领域关系互动的研究,具有一定的政策启发意义。

Community resident autonomy and grid management are two wings of community governance system,and their effective connection is of great significance to strengthen and perfect the community governance system.However,in practice,there is not only a"failure"dilemma,but also a disconnection problem.Under the guidance of the holistic governance theory,this study builds an analytical framework for the effective cohesive modes of the two,and starts with the innovation cases of three national experimental areas,presents and compares the effective cohesive modes formed by the three,and reveals their internal logic.It is found that will form different cohesive modes. Based on this, the three experimental areas respectively form three connecting modes, namelyintegrated integration, dual-network symbiosis and four-dimensional embedding. All of them take the guidance of Party construction as the connecting axis line, pay attention to enriching and innovating micro-autonomous organizations and mechanisms of communities, and follow the holistic governance theory and logic. It has formed multiple practical logistics, such as four-dimensionalcohesion, symbiosis and embedding, autonomy and grid dual attributes, system integration and interlocking, and at the same timefollows the evolution and value logic of fragmentation to wholeness and then to "community". Based on various differences, they canbe divided into two types of patterns, namely two-way and one-way cohesion patterns. Both of these two types have good effectiveness in getting rid of the fragmentation of community governance and improving the integrity of community governance, and thetwo-way cohesion mode can also provide an engine for the "community" of the community. This study expands the research on theinteraction between the two in this field and has certain policy implications.