期刊文献+

大数据“杀熟”的法律治理:基于治理缺口填补的视角 被引量:1

Legal Governance of Big Data Discriminatory Pricing:from the Perspective of Governance Gap Filling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 互联网平台根据消费者设备、消费场所、消费频次等对消费者实施大数据“杀熟”行为,引发了社会公众的不公平感知。新的制度供给总是伴随制度供给成本与社会风险,对大数据“杀熟”行为的治理应辩证处理,以市场在资源配置中的决定性作用发挥为前提,从既有治理缺口处寻得突破;既有治理体系,对大数据“杀熟”造成的个体损害进行较为充分的保护,但对公共利益的保护确存在明显缺口;治理的改进需要以反垄断法为重要抓手,弥补对公共利益保护的不足。 the internet platforms offer big data discriminatory pricing according to devices used by customers,places of consumption,frequency of consumption and so on,which leads to unfair perception of the public.The new institutional supply is always accompanied by institutional supply costs and social risks.Therefore,the governance of big data discriminatory pricing should be handled dialectically,and the decisive role of the market in resource allocation should be taken as the premise to find a breakthrough from the existing governance gaps.The existing governance system adequately protects individual damages caused by big data discriminatory pricing,but there is a clear gap in the protection of public interests.The improvement of governance needs to take the Anti-monopoly Law as an important starting point to make up for the lack of protection of public interests.
作者 江芃 喻玲 Jiang Peng;Yu Ling(Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330038,P.R.China)
出处 《江西科技师范大学学报》 2023年第1期42-47,62,共7页 Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University
基金 国家社科基金后期资助重点项目“个性化新闻推荐的反垄断规制研究”(编号:21FFXA005) 江西财经大学第十六届学生科研课题“在算法与算计之间:算法推荐技术商业应用及其一体化规制”(编号:20210915220442050)。
关键词 大数据 算法 法律治理 big data algorithm legal governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献117

共引文献445

同被引文献26

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部