期刊文献+

司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病的快速卫生技术评估 被引量:4

Rapid Health Technology Assessment of Semaglutide in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 采用快速卫生技术评估评价司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病的有效性、安全性和经济性。方法 检索Embase、PubMed、the Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据库和卫生技术评估相关的网站。由2名评价者独立地根据纳入、排除标准筛选文献,提取数据,评价文献质量并进行分析。结果 共纳入12篇系统评价/meta分析,13篇药物经济学研究。结果显示,在有效性方面,司美格鲁肽能够显著降低HbA1c、FPG和SBP水平,并减轻体质量;在安全性方面,司美格鲁肽的胃肠道不良反应发生率相对更高,同时司美格鲁肽并不会增加低血糖和急性胰腺炎的发生率;在经济性方面,司美格鲁肽能够延长患者的质量调整生命年,其增量成本效果比低于所在国家的意愿支付阈值,具有成本效果优势。结论司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病具有较好的有效性、安全性和经济性。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy, safety and economy of semaglutide in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus by rapid health technology assessment. METHODS Systematic retrieval of Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library,CNKI, Wanfang datebases and health technology assessment related websites. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, evaluated article quality and performed analysis. RESULTS A total of 12 systematic/meta-analyses and 13 economic evaluations were included. The results showed that semaglutide could significantly decease the level of HbA1c, FPG, SBP and reduce weight in terms of effectiveness. In terms of safety, semaglutide increased the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse, but not increased the incidence of hypoglycemia and acute pancreatitis. In terms of economy, semaglutide could prolong quality-adjusted life years(QALYs) and had a good cost-effectiveness. Meanwile,the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of semaglutide belowed the willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSION Semaglutide has good efficacy, safety and economic in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
作者 李传华 高榕荫 LI Chuanhua;GAO Rongyin(Department of Pharmacy,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University(the First People’s Hospital of Changzhou City),Changzhou 213000,China)
出处 《中国现代应用药学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第5期683-688,共6页 Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
关键词 司美格鲁肽 2型糖尿病 快速卫生技术评估 semaglutide type 2 diabetes mellitus rapid health technology assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1Tricco A C,Antony J,Zarin W,et al.A scoping review of rapid review methods[J].BMC Med,2015,13(1):224.
  • 2Polisena J,Garritty C,Kamel C,et al.Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making:a descriptive analysis of processes and methods[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):26.
  • 3Ganann R,Ciliska D,Thomas H.Expediting systematic reviews:methods and implications of rapid reviews[J].Implement Sci,2010(5):56.
  • 4Khangura S,Konnyu K,Cushman R,et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev,2012(1):10.
  • 5Harker J,Kleijnen J.What is a rapid review?A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].Int J Evid Based Healthc,2012,10(4):397-410.
  • 6Featherstone R M,Dryden D M,Foisy M,et al.Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews:an analysis of results,conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):50.
  • 7Hailey D.Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
  • 8Brouwers M,Kho M E,Browman G P,et al.AGREE II:Advancing guideline development,reporting and evaluation in healthcare[J].J Clin Epidemol,2010,63(12):1308-1311.
  • 9Higgins J P T,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][J/OL].(2011-03-10)[2015-07-21].http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Shea B J,Grimshaw J M,Wells G A,et al.Development of AMSTAR:A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7(10):1-10.e7-8.

共引文献240

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部