摘要
目的 借鉴药典讨论组(pharmacopeial discussion group,PDG)对欧洲药典、美国药典和日本药局方药用辅料标准协调的经验,探析中国药典协调工作的思路和方法。方法 查阅PDG协调工作背景、工作程序、工作进展,分析三方药典协调标准的特点,梳理PDG药用辅料标准与中国药典异同点。结果 中国药典2020年版四部相应药用辅料标准有一定的先进性,也有提升空间。结论 建议结合中国国情,加强与PDG联系,明确标准协调的原则,提高中国药用辅料标准水平,稳步推进中国药用辅料标准国际协调工作。
OBJECTIVE To explore the ideas and methods of international harmonization of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia,drawing on the experience of the pharmacopeial discussion group(PDG) on the harmonization standards for pharmaceutical excipients in the European Pharmacopoeia, the United States Pharmacopeia and the Japanese Pharmacopoeia. METHODS By reviewing the PDG working background, procedures, and progress, analyze the characteristics of harmonization standards, and sorted out the similarities and differences between the harmonization standards and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia for pharmaceutical excipients. RESULTS The corresponding standards for pharmaceutical excipients in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2020 edition) volume Ⅳ had a certain advancement, and still need to be further improved. CONCLUSION It is recommended that Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission strengthen the connection with PDG, combine the national conditions of China, clarify the principles of standards harmonization, improve the level of pharmaceutical excipients standards, and steadily promote the progress of the international harmonization standards of pharmaceutical excipients.
作者
李美芳
陈蕾
凌霄
蒋赟
LI Meifang;CHEN Lei;LING Xiao;JIANG Yun(Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control,Shenzhen 518057,China;Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission,Beijing 100061,China;USP-China Office,Shanghai 200131,China;NPMA Key Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Excipients Engineering Technology Research,Hunan Institute for Drug Control,Changsha 410001,China)
出处
《中国现代应用药学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第5期689-696,共8页
Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
关键词
药典讨论组
药用辅料
标准协调
pharmacopeial discussion group(PDG)
pharmaceutical excipients
harmonization standards