期刊文献+

多模态MR成像在评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效中的价值 被引量:1

The Value of Multimodal MRI in Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T多模态MR成像对乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值。方法连续性收集行全程新辅助化疗(NAC)并最终行手术治疗的51例非特殊型浸润性导管癌(NS-IDC)患者,分别于NAC前、化疗结束后1~2周内行多模态MR检查,测量并计算各参数值。根据NAC前穿刺活检结果,分为分化较好组和分化较差组。按NAC后病理评估结果,分为组织学显著反应(MHR)组和组织学非显著反应(NMHR)组。探讨NAC前后两组癌灶最大径(D)、表观扩散系数(ADC)、平均扩散系数(MD)、平均扩散峰度(MK)值及其变化率的差异,分析各参数值与NAC疗效的相关性,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定多模态MR成像参数对化疗疗效评估的诊断效能,并获得诊断临界点。结果显著反应组19例,非显著反应组32例。NAC后,两组病灶的D、ADC、MD、MK值及其变化率均有显著差异,且诊断效能较高。MR与病理测量最大径值呈高度正相关(r=0.912,P<0.01)。△MD%、△D%、△ADC%、△MK%预测疗效的ROC下面积分别为0.90、0.89、0.87、0.67,最佳临界预测值分别为21.15%、69.19%、55.30%、30.15%,评估的敏感性分别系94.7%、73.7%、63.2%、57.9%,特异性系78.1%、96.9%、96.9%、71.9%。结论应用多模态MR成像技术可从多方位探测肿瘤组织化疗前后动态变化特征,△MD%、△D%对乳腺癌NAC疗效评价具有较高的诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the value of 3.0T multimodality magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)for breast cancer.Methods A continuous collection of 51 patients with non-specific invasive ductal carcinoma(NS-IDC)who underwent full course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)and eventually surgery were collected.All patients underwent multimodal MR examination before NAC and within 1~2 weeks after chemotherapy,and the values of each parameter were measured and calculated.According to histologic grading before NAC,the patients were classified into well-differentiated and poor-differentiated group.The patients were classified into major histological response(MHR)and non-major histological response(NMHR)according to the results of pathological evaluation.To investigate the difference of D,ADC,MD,MK and change rate between the two groups,analyze the correlation between each parameter value and NAC efficacy.The receiver-operating characteristic curve(ROC)was used to determine the efficacy of multimodality MR imaging parameters to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy and to obtain the diagnostic cut-off point.Results There were 19 cases of MHR and 32 cases of NMHR.After NAC,The maximum diameter of tumors(D),ADC,MD,MK values,and their preoperative rate of change were significantly different between the two groups,and the diagnostic efficiency was higher.The maximum diameter measured with MRI measurement were positively correlated to that of pathological results(r=0.912,P<0.01).ROC analysis showed that the area under ROC curve of△MD%,△D%,△ADC%,△MK%in predicting treatment effect were 0.90,0.89,0.87 and 0.67 respectively.Using 21.15%of△MD%,69.19%of△D%,55.30%of△ADC%,30.15%of△MK%after NAC as the cut off value to predict MHR,the sensitivity were 94.7%,73.7%,63.2%,57.9%respectively and specificity were 78.1%,96.9%,96.9%,71.9%respectively.Conclusion The application of multimodality MR imaging technology can detect the dynamic changes of tumor tissues before and after chemotherapy from multiple directions,and△MD%and△D%have high diagnostic value for the evaluation of the efficacy of NAC in breast cancer.
作者 朱婷婷 李永姣 冉强 罗青毅 刘衡 张体江 ZHU Ting-ting;LI Yong-jiao;RAN Qiang;LUO Qing-yi;LIU Heng;ZHANG Ti-jiang(Department of Radiology,People's Hospital of Honghuagang District,Zunyi,Zunyi 563003,Guizhou Province,China;Department of Radiology,the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563003,Guizhou Province,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2023年第4期94-97,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 遵义市科技计划项目(遵市科合社字(2018)250号)。
关键词 非特殊型浸润性导管癌 新辅助化疗 扩散加权成像 扩散峰度成像 Non-Specific Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Diffusion Weighted Imaging Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1陈舒婕,沈坤炜.MRI在乳腺癌新辅助化疗中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(23):1641-1643. 被引量:1
  • 2Kuerer HM,Newman LA,Smith TL,et al.Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J].J Clin Oncol,1999,17(2):460-469.
  • 3Chollet P,Amat S,Cure H,et al.Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer[J].Br J Cancer,2002,86(7)1041-1046.
  • 4Sahoo S,Lester SC.Pathology of breast carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy:an overview with recommendations on specimen processing and reporting[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2009,133(4):633-642.
  • 5Pinder SE,Provenzano E,Earl H,et al.Laboratory handling and histology reporting of breast specimens from patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J].Histopathology,2007,50(4):409-417.
  • 6Rabban J.The new edition(7th)AJCC staging system for breast cancer.A summary of key changes[EB/OL],(2010-06)[2015-02-09].http://labmed.ucsf.edu/uploads/210/101_new_ajcc_ staging_of_breast_cancer_what_has_changed.pdf.
  • 7Edge S,Byrd D,Compton C,et al.AJCC cancer staging manual[M].New York:Springer,2010.
  • 8Schnitt SJ,Collins LC.Biopsy interpretation of the breast[M].Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2009:435-439.
  • 9Lakhani SR,Ellis 10,Schnitt SJ,et al.WHO classification of tumours of the breast[M].Lyon:IARC Press,2012.
  • 10Rabban JT,Glidden D,Kwan ML,et al.Pure and predominantly pure intralymphatic breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy:an unusual and adverse pattern of residual disease[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2009,33(2):256-263.

共引文献130

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部