摘要
【目的】探究追续权的权利性质,为我国追续权的入法提供相关思考。【方法】借助帕累托改进理论解释追续权的正当性。通过运用霍菲尔德八个基本法律概念对著作人身权、著作财产权与追续权进行权利对比剖析。【结果】发现追续权既不属于著作人身权,也不属于著作财产权,更不是两者的混合权利。【结论】追续权是立法者对于艺术家丧失艺术作品原件展览权的补偿,属于帕累托改进的结果,是一种可以和两者并列为其他权利的未来利益请求权。
[Purposes]To explore the nature of the Resale Right and provide relevant thinking for the incorporation of the Resale Right in China.[Methods]Use Pareto Improvement theory to explain the legitimacy of the Resale Right.Through the use of Hohfeld's eight fundamental legal conceptions,the author makes a comparative analysis of moral rights and economic rights in Copyright with the Resale Right.[Findings]It is found that the Resale Right is neither the moral rights in Copyright and economic rights in Copyright,nor is a mixed right of the two.[Conclusions]The Resale Right is the legislator's compensation for the artist's loss of the right to exhibit the original works of art,which is the result of Pareto's Improvement and a future interest claim that can be juxtaposed with the moral rights and economic rights in Copyright as other rights in Copyright.
作者
吴冬
WU Dong(Law School&Intellectual Property School of Jinan University,Guangzhou 511436,China)
出处
《河南科技》
2023年第7期131-135,共5页
Henan Science and Technology
基金
暨南大学优秀本科推免生科研创新培育计划([2010]111号)。
关键词
追续权
霍菲尔德
基本法律概念
权利性质
帕累托最优
resale right
wesley hohfeld
fundamental legal conceptions
nature of rights
pareto optimatily