期刊文献+

金课视域下基于布鲁姆认知目标分类法的组织学与胚胎学过程性评价体系的构建及应用

Construction and application of process assessment system associated with bloom’s taxonomy in histology and embryology by the perspective of golden courses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,过程性评价虽已广泛应用于高校教学,但仍然存在着系统性不高、针对性不强、高阶性不足等问题,同时对学生能力的培养大多停滞于低阶水平。本研究以布鲁姆认知目标分类法为指导,聚焦金课标准,构建以能力为导向的评价体系,强化评价体系的系统性和针对性,并使过程性评价与医师胜任力紧密联系,以助力“两性一度”教学目标的实现。 At present,process assessment has been widely used in college teaching.However,there are still some problems about it,such as low systematicness,imprecise pertinence and insufficient higher-order learning,and the cultivation of students’ability is mostly stagnant at lower level.This study,which was guided by Bloom’s Taxonomy by the perspective of Golden Courses,con­structed a competency-oriented evaluation system,strengthened the systematicness and pertinence of the system,and made the process evaluation closely related to the competence of doctors.This new evaluation system ultimately helps to achieve the teaching objective of“two characteristics and one degree”in histology and embryology.
作者 赵春艳 李如江 陈燕春 Zhao Chunyan;Li Rujiang;Chen Yanchun(Department of Histology and Embryology,WeiFang Medical University,WeiFang 261053,China)
出处 《中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2023年第1期109-114,共6页 Chinese Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
基金 山东省教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度课题(2020ZC265) 山东省研究生教育优质课程项目《组织学技术》(SDYKC20151)。
关键词 布鲁姆认知目标分类法 过程性评价 Bloom’s Taxonomy process assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献62

  • 1高凌飚.过程性评价的理念和功能[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004(6):102-106. 被引量:321
  • 2Kendall J S,Marzano R J.Content knowledge:A compendium of standards and benchmarks for k-12 education[M].Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development(ASCD),2000.
  • 3Dugger W E Jr.Twenty years of education standards for technology education in the united states.M.J.de Vries,I.Mottier(eds.)[C].Intc-cnational Handbook of Technology Education,2006:65-81.
  • 4Anderson L W,Krathwohl D R,Airasian P W,et al.A taxonomy for learning,teaching,and assessing:a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M].New York:Longman,2001:41-46.
  • 5International Technology Education Association (ITEA).(2000).Standards for technological literacy:Content for the study of technology[EB/OL].(2006-12-25)[2009-11-25].http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf.
  • 6卢雪梅.从技术面谈九年一贯课程能力指标建构-美国学习标准建构的启示.教育研究信息,2004,12(2):3-34.
  • 7徐启源.中英美澳四国小学科技教育课程之比较研究[D].台湾:台中师范学院国民教育研究所,2002:104.
  • 8Wheeler P,Haertal G D.Resource Handbook on Performance Assessment and Measurement:A Tool for Smdent,Practitioners,and Policymakers[M].EREAPA Associates,1993:40-43.
  • 9杨振升 洪淑萍.基本能力指标与转化-以语文学习领域为例.教育研究月刊,2002,(96):23-33.
  • 10郑蒽如 林世华.布鲁姆认知领域教育目标分类修订版理论与实务之探讨一以九年一贯数学领域分段能力指标为例.台东大学教育学报,2004,15(2):247-274.

共引文献206

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部