期刊文献+

OECD主要国家及地区养老服务筹资模式及政府财政投入

Fund-raising Models and Government Financial Investment in Elderly Care Services in OECD Countries and Regions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在世界范围内老龄化加剧背景下,全球各个国家针对本国老龄化特点都进行了不同程度的养老政策改革,特别是在OECD成员国的改革中,一个共同的目标是在人口老龄化过程中维持政府投入与市场及社会分担之间的平衡。自20世纪80年代末以来,一些发达国家根据自身经济社会发展现状和特点,通过发挥政府、社会和市场的作用,建立了不同的养老服务筹资模式,为养老服务的持续供给提供了充足的资金保障。本文基于养老服务的两种筹资模式,以英国、美国、德国和日本为典型案例,分析这四个国家养老服务的财政投入,为我国养老服务提供借鉴。 Under the background of the intensification of aging in the world,various countries around the world have carried out varying degrees of pension policy reforms.In particular,in the reform of OECD member countries and regions,a common goal is to maintain the balance between government input and market and social sharing in the process of population aging.Since the end of 1980s,developed countries have established unique fund-raising models of elderly care services by giving full play to the leading role of the government,which provides substantial financial support for the services.Based on the two fund-raising models of elderly care services,this paper analyzes the government financial investment in the services in four countries,i.e.the United Kingdom,the United States,Germany and Japan,which could provide reference for elderly care services in China.
作者 程子非 CHENG Zifei(Journal Management Center of the Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《南昌师范学院学报》 2023年第1期134-140,共7页 Journal of Nanchang Normal University
关键词 OECD 养老服务 筹资模式 财政投入 OECD elderly care services fund-raising model financial investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Hacker, J. S. The Divided Welfare State: over Public and Private Social Benefits in States. Cambridge : Cambridge Press, 2002 The Battle the United University.
  • 2Julian Le Grand. Quasi- Markets and Social Policy. The Economic Journal, 1991, 101 (408).
  • 3Julian Le Grand. Quasi -Market Versus State Provi- sion of Public Services: Some Ethical Considerations, Public Reason, 2011, 3 (2).
  • 4Travers, P. Quasi -market for the Social Services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 1995, 54 (3).
  • 5[英]霍华德·格伦内斯特,[英]朱利安·勒·格兰德.市场,私有化和医疗改革的赞成与反对意见:英国福利提供准市场的发展[A].[英]霍华德·格伦内斯特.英国社会政策论文集[c].北京:商务印书馆,2003.200.
  • 6Glendinning, C., Davies, B., Pickard, L., et al. Funding Long - term Care ./'or Older People: Lessons from Other Countries. York: York Publishing Services Ltd, 2004.
  • 7Wittenberg,R.,Sandlu,B.,Knapp,M.长期照护筹资模式选择:公共形式与私人形式[A],Mossia-los,E.,Dixon,A.,Figueras,J.,Kutzin,J.医疗保障筹资:欧洲的选择[c].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社.2009.246-247.
  • 8Rodrigues, R. Long - term Care : the Problem of Sus- tainable Financing[ EB/OL]. file :///C :/Users/lian- gyu/Downloads/Discussion% 20paper SI 2014% 20 ( 1 ). pdf.
  • 9Forder, J. , Allan, S. Competition in the Care Homes Market: a report for Office of Health Economics Commission on competition in the NHS. https://kar. kent. ac. uk/34348/.
  • 10Colombo, F. et al. Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long - term Care. Paris: OECD Publish- ing, 2011.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部