期刊文献+

问题导向干预对肝癌介入治疗患者术后胃肠功能及主观幸福感的影响 被引量:5

Effect of problem oriented intervention on gastrointestinal function and subjective well-being in patients with liver cancer after interventional therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨问题导向干预对肝癌介入治疗患者术后胃肠功能及主观幸福感的影响。方法选取160例肝癌介入治疗患者,以问题导向干预实施时间为分界,将2018年6月至2019年6月问题导向干预实施前接受常规护理干预的80例肝癌介入治疗患者作为对照组,将2019年7月至2020年6月问题导向干预实施后收治的80例肝癌介入治疗患者作为观察组。比较两组患者的术后胃肠功能恢复指标、主观幸福感[总体幸福感量表(GWB)]、心理压力[成人心理压力量表(APSS)]、生活质量[癌症患者生命质量测定量表之肝癌量表(QLICP-LI)]、并发症发生情况及护理满意度。结果观察组患者术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次排气时间、首次排便时间均明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。干预后,观察组患者GWB量表各维度评分均高于本组干预前和对照组,APSS量表评分低于对照组,QLICP-LI量表各维度评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。观察组患者并发症总发生率为10.00%(8/80),与对照组患者的15.00%(12/80)比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。观察组患者的护理满意度为90.00%(72/80),高于对照组患者的76.25%(61/80),差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论围手术期问题导向干预可促进肝癌介入治疗患者术后胃肠功能的恢复,提高主观幸福感,减轻心理压力,提高生活质量及护理满意度。 Objective To explore the effect of problem oriented intervention on gastrointestinal function and subjective well-being in patients with liver cancer after interventional therapy.Method A total of 160 patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy were selected,and 80 patients with liver cancer undergoing routine nursing intervention from June 2018 to June 2019 before the implementation of problem oriented intervention were selected as the control group,and 80 patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy from July 2019 to June 2020 after the implementation of problem oriented intervention were selected as the observation group.The recovery indicators of gastrointestinal function,subjective well-being[general well-being schedule(GWB)],psychological stress[adult psychological stress scale(APSS)],quality of life[quality of life instruments for cancer patients-liver cancer(QLICP-LI)],complications,and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Result The recovery time of bowel sounds,the first exhaust time,and the first defecation time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).After intervention,the scores of each dimension of the GWB scale in the observation group were higher than those before the intervention and control group,the APSS scale score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the scores of all dimensions of the QLICP-LI scale were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 10.00%(8/80),which was not significantly different from 15.00%(12/80)in the control group(P>0.05).The nursing satisfaction in the observation group was 90.00%(72/80),higher than 76.25%(61/80)in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Perioperative problem oriented intervention can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function,improve subjective well-being,alleviate psychological pressure,improve quality of life and nursing satisfaction in patients with liver cancer after interventional therapy.
作者 唐丽娟 窦婉 李振洁 TANG Lijuan;DOU Wan;LI Zhenjie(Department of Infectious Disease,Nanyang Central Hospital,Nanyang 473000,He’nan,China;Department of Public Health,Shiyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shiyan 442200,Hubei,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2023年第5期561-565,共5页 Oncology Progress
关键词 问题导向干预 肝癌 介入治疗 胃肠功能 主观幸福感 心理压力 problem oriented intervention liver cancer interventional therapy gastrointestinal function subjective well-being psychological stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献146

  • 1边立衡,王艺峥,付建忠,赵性泉.未破裂颅内动脉瘤外科治疗指南[J].中国卒中杂志,2008,3(5):371-380. 被引量:66
  • 2李洪琴.重症急性胰腺炎的特殊治疗及护理对策[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(10):203-204. 被引量:1
  • 3李格,沈渔邨,陈昌惠,李淑然,张维熙,刘棉.简易精神状态检查表在不同人群中的试测研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1989,3(4):148-151. 被引量:93
  • 4万崇华,方积乾,汤学良,张灿珍,卢玉波,孟琼,高丽.SF-36量表用于肝癌患者生活质量测定的效果评价[J].肿瘤,2005,25(5):492-494. 被引量:92
  • 5周炯,王荫华.焦虑抑郁量表评价分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(10):665-665. 被引量:85
  • 6Ware IE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment(IQOLA)project. J Clin Epide- miol, 1998, 51(11): 903-912.
  • 7Sehipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of Life of cancer patients: the functional living index: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984, 54(32): 472-483.
  • 8Wan C, Fang J, Yang Z, et al. Development and validation of a qual-I ity of life instrument for patients with liver cancer QOL-LC. Am Clin Oncol, 2010, 33(5): 448-455.
  • 9Wan C, Fang J, Yang Z, et al. Development andvalidation of a qual- ity of life instrument for patients with liver cancer QOL-LC. Am J Clin Oncol, 2010, 33(5): 448-455.
  • 10Heffernan N, Celia D, Webster K, et al. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hepatobiliary Cancers: ~he Func- tional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002, 20(9): 2229-2239.

共引文献1111

同被引文献67

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部