摘要
加快数字化发展是我国的战略规划,然而私权制度的底层逻辑还远不能支撑这一规划。算法归责应有理性标准,理性标准是民事归责制度中的必要评判工具,同时算法适用理性标准可以促进正义,还具有技术价值。然而,算法与传统主体有很大差异,算法归责直接适用传统主体理性标准将面临困境。所以,在现阶段应当明确算法的意思参与机制是归责的前提;传统主体在算法的开发使用中应承担应有的积极注意义务;通过承认部分算法的行为主体性和为算法设计独立责任来协调算法与传统归责体系的结构冲突。
Accelerating digital development is our strategic plan,yet the underlying logic of the private rights system is far from being able to support this layout.Algorithmic imputation should have a standard of rationality,which is firstly a necessary judging tool in a civil imputation system,and secondly an algorithmic application of the standard of rationality can promote justice and also has a technical value.However,algorithms are very different from traditional subjects,and the direct application of traditional subject rationality standards for algorithm will face difficulties.Therefore,at this stage,it should be clear that the meaningful participation mechanism of algorithms is a prerequisite for attribution of responsibility;traditional subjects should assume due active attention in the development and use of algorithms;and the structural conflict between algorithms and traditional imputation systems should be reconciled by recognizing the actor-subjectivity of some algorithms and designing independent responsibilities for algorithms.
出处
《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期39-46,153,共9页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)