摘要
目的:探讨地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎(RMPP)的临床疗效及安全性差异。方法:128例RMPP患儿按随机数表法分为A组(63例)和B组(65例)。在常规治疗基础上,A组给予地塞米松0.35 mg/(kg·d),每日1次静脉滴注,B组给予甲泼尼龙2 mg/(kg·d),每日2次静脉滴注,疗程均为5 d,比较两组患儿治疗总有效率、临床症状改善情况、血浆心肌酶谱[肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)]、血清炎性因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)]及药物不良反应发生情况。结果:B组总有效率为86.15%,高于A组的71.43%(P<0.05)。B组患儿体温恢复正常时间、咳嗽消失时间、肺部啰音消失时间和X线胸片肺部阴影消失时间分别为(4.55±1.05)d、(6.67±1.12)d、(10.76±1.47)d和(7.97±1.03)d,短于A组的(5.24±1.42)d、(7.23±1.57)d、(11.63±2.52)d和(8.43±1.26)d,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后,两组患儿CK、CK-MB、LDH、TNF-α、IL-6和IFN-γ水平均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且B组降低幅度更大(P<0.05)。A组不良反应发生率为22.22%,高于B组的9.23%(P<0.05)。结论:甲泼尼龙治疗儿童RMMP的临床疗效和安全性均优于地塞米松。
Objective:To observe the difference of clinical efficacy and safety of dexamethasone vs.methylprednisolone in the treatment of children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia(RMPP).Methods:A total of 128 children with RMPP were randomly divided into group A(n=63)and group B(n=65).On the basis of conventional treatment,group A was given dexamethasone 0.35 mg/(kg·d),intravenously once a day,and group B was given methylprednisolone 2 mg/(kg·d),2 times a day for intravenous drip.Two groups were both treated for 5 days.The clinical efficacy,improvement of clinical symptoms,plasma myocardial enzyme profile such as creatine kinase(CK),creatine kinase isoenzyme(CK-MB),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),serum inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),and gamma-interferon(IFN-γ)and adverse drug reactions between the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate in group B was 86.15%,which was higher than that in group A(71.43%)(P<0.05).Time that symptoms disappeared of group B was much shorter than that in group A,such as fever(4.55±1.05)d vs.(5.24±1.12)d,cough(6.67±1.12)d vs.(7.23±1.57)d,lung rales(10.76±1.47)d vs.(11.63±2.52)d and X-ray lung shadow(7.97±1.03)d vs.(8.43±1.26)d,and the differences were all statistically significant(all P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of CK,CK-MB,LDH,TNF-α,IL-6 and IFN-γof the two groups were all decreased compared with before treatment(P<0.05),and the decrease in group B was more significant than that in group A(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse drug reactions in group A was 22.22%,which was higher than 9.23%in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion:The results of this study show that methylprednisolone is better than dexamethasone in clinical efficacy and safety in children with RMPP.
作者
贺扬
高荣荣
宋世卿
吕晓倩
马忠正
殷站茹
He Yang;Gao Rongrong;Song Shiqing;Lyu Xiaoqian;Ma Zhongzheng;Yin Zhanru(Hengshui People’s Hospital,Hebei Hengshui 053000,China;Shenzhou People’s Hospital,Hebei Shenzhou 053800,China)
出处
《儿科药学杂志》
CAS
2023年第4期40-43,共4页
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy
关键词
地塞米松
甲泼尼龙
难治性肺炎支原体肺炎
儿童
疗效
安全性
dexamethasone
methylprednisolone
refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia
children
efficacy
safety