期刊文献+

地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗儿童难治性支原体肺炎的疗效及安全性比较 被引量:3

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Versus Methylprednisolone in the Treatment of Children with Refractory Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎(RMPP)的临床疗效及安全性差异。方法:128例RMPP患儿按随机数表法分为A组(63例)和B组(65例)。在常规治疗基础上,A组给予地塞米松0.35 mg/(kg·d),每日1次静脉滴注,B组给予甲泼尼龙2 mg/(kg·d),每日2次静脉滴注,疗程均为5 d,比较两组患儿治疗总有效率、临床症状改善情况、血浆心肌酶谱[肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)]、血清炎性因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)]及药物不良反应发生情况。结果:B组总有效率为86.15%,高于A组的71.43%(P<0.05)。B组患儿体温恢复正常时间、咳嗽消失时间、肺部啰音消失时间和X线胸片肺部阴影消失时间分别为(4.55±1.05)d、(6.67±1.12)d、(10.76±1.47)d和(7.97±1.03)d,短于A组的(5.24±1.42)d、(7.23±1.57)d、(11.63±2.52)d和(8.43±1.26)d,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后,两组患儿CK、CK-MB、LDH、TNF-α、IL-6和IFN-γ水平均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且B组降低幅度更大(P<0.05)。A组不良反应发生率为22.22%,高于B组的9.23%(P<0.05)。结论:甲泼尼龙治疗儿童RMMP的临床疗效和安全性均优于地塞米松。 Objective:To observe the difference of clinical efficacy and safety of dexamethasone vs.methylprednisolone in the treatment of children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia(RMPP).Methods:A total of 128 children with RMPP were randomly divided into group A(n=63)and group B(n=65).On the basis of conventional treatment,group A was given dexamethasone 0.35 mg/(kg·d),intravenously once a day,and group B was given methylprednisolone 2 mg/(kg·d),2 times a day for intravenous drip.Two groups were both treated for 5 days.The clinical efficacy,improvement of clinical symptoms,plasma myocardial enzyme profile such as creatine kinase(CK),creatine kinase isoenzyme(CK-MB),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),serum inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),and gamma-interferon(IFN-γ)and adverse drug reactions between the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate in group B was 86.15%,which was higher than that in group A(71.43%)(P<0.05).Time that symptoms disappeared of group B was much shorter than that in group A,such as fever(4.55±1.05)d vs.(5.24±1.12)d,cough(6.67±1.12)d vs.(7.23±1.57)d,lung rales(10.76±1.47)d vs.(11.63±2.52)d and X-ray lung shadow(7.97±1.03)d vs.(8.43±1.26)d,and the differences were all statistically significant(all P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of CK,CK-MB,LDH,TNF-α,IL-6 and IFN-γof the two groups were all decreased compared with before treatment(P<0.05),and the decrease in group B was more significant than that in group A(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse drug reactions in group A was 22.22%,which was higher than 9.23%in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion:The results of this study show that methylprednisolone is better than dexamethasone in clinical efficacy and safety in children with RMPP.
作者 贺扬 高荣荣 宋世卿 吕晓倩 马忠正 殷站茹 He Yang;Gao Rongrong;Song Shiqing;Lyu Xiaoqian;Ma Zhongzheng;Yin Zhanru(Hengshui People’s Hospital,Hebei Hengshui 053000,China;Shenzhou People’s Hospital,Hebei Shenzhou 053800,China)
出处 《儿科药学杂志》 CAS 2023年第4期40-43,共4页 Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy
关键词 地塞米松 甲泼尼龙 难治性肺炎支原体肺炎 儿童 疗效 安全性 dexamethasone methylprednisolone refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia children efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献132

共引文献1830

同被引文献41

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部