高颠覆因子论文学术影响力评价研究

Academic Impact Evaluation of Disruptive Papers

颠覆因子是基于引文网络识别和探测颠覆性研究的新兴指标。研究高颠覆因子论文的计量特征及其学术影响力,不仅有助于丰富论文评价体系,也有利于对颠覆性研究识别方法的补充和完善。以1954—2014年PubMed中被Web of Science收录的12 472 382篇论文为总数据集,统计2005—2014年高颠覆因子论文的发表年、引用分布等计量特征。在比较高颠覆因子论文学术影响力指标的基础上,改进“公平性测试”方法,深入探究颠覆因子与Altmetrics指标、引文分析指标的相关性,并试图探讨开放获取对高颠覆因子论文各指标的影响。从描述性统计来看,高颠覆因子论文的被引频次差异较大,来源期刊集中于欧美地区的JCR Q1区权威医学期刊和综合性期刊;从学术影响力指标来看,高颠覆因子论文的学术影响力差异较大,可将颠覆因子作为评价论文创新力的补充指标,且在高颠覆因子论文中,开放获取论文的各评价指标值均显著高于传统付费论文,更易表现出高社会关注度和高影响力。

Disruption is a new index based on citation network to identify and detect disruptive research.Research on the bibliometric characteristics and academic influence of disruptive papers will not only help to enrich the evaluation system of papers,but also help to supplement and improve the identification methods of disruptive research.Taking 12472382 papers included in Web of Science from PubMed database from 1954 to 2014 as the total data set,the publication year and citation distribution of disruptive papers from 2005 to 2014 are counted.On the basis of comparing the academic influence indicators of disruptive papers,the fairness test method is improved to deeply explore the correlation between disruption,Altmetrics indicators,and citation analysis indicators as well as the impact of open access.From the perspective of descriptive statistics,the citation times of disruptive papers have great difference,and the source journals are mainly JCR Q1 authoritative medical journals and comprehensive journals in Europe and the United States.From the perspective of academic influence index,the academic influence of disruptive papers varies greatly.So,the disruption can be used as a supplementary index to evaluate the innovation ability of papers.Among disruptive papers,the evaluation indexes of open access papers are significantly higher than traditional paid papers,and are more likely to show high social attention and high influence.