期刊文献+

切口皮下多孔导管联合罗哌卡因镇痛在腹腔镜胃肠手术后加速康复中的应用 被引量:1

Application of incision subcutaneous porous catheter combined with ropivacaine analgesia in enhanced recovery after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察切口皮下多孔导管联合罗哌卡因镇痛在腹腔镜胃肠手术后加速康复中的可行性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2021年8月至2022年4月同济大学附属上海市第四人民医院140例腹腔镜胃肠手术患者的临床资料。其中,采用常规术后镇痛70例(对照组),常规术后镇痛基础上行切口皮下多孔导管联合罗哌卡因镇痛70例(观察组)。术后4、24、32、48、56和72 h评估疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),记录皮下置管并发症、切口感染、术后恶心呕吐、神经症状、拔管时间、患者满意度、肠功能恢复时间和住院时间。结果观察组术后4、24、32、48、56和72 h VAS均明显低于对照组[1.000(-0.250,2.250)分比1.000(-1.000,3.000)分、2.000(1.000,3.000)分比4.000(2.000,6.000)分、1.000(0.000,2.000)分比3.000(1.000,5.000)分、2.000(1.000,3.000)分比3.000(1.750,4.250)分、(1.100±0.934)分比(2.085±0.943)分和(0.985±0.842)分比(1.814±0.921)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或<0.01)。观察组肠功能恢复时间和住院时间明显短于对照组[(1.743±0.557)d比(2.200±0.714)d和(8.043±1.160)d比(8.757±1.221)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组切口感染率、术后恶心呕吐发生率、拔管时间和患者不满意率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组均未发生皮下置管并发症和神经症状。结论腹腔镜胃肠手术患者术后行切口皮下多孔导管联合罗哌卡因镇痛安全、有效、可行。加速康复外科下的多模式镇痛可加快胃肠术后的康复,缩短术后住院时间。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of incision subcutaneous porous catheter combined with ropivacaine analgesia in enhanced recovery after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.Methods The clinical data of 140 patients underwent gastrointestinal surgery from August 2021 to April 2022 in Shanghai Fourth People′s Hospital,School of Medicine,Tongji University were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,70 patients were given routine postoperative analgesia(control group),and 70 patients were given incision subcutaneous porous catheter combined with ropivacaine analgesia on the basis of routine postoperative analgesia(observation group).The visual analogue score(VAS)4,24,32,48,56 and 72 h after operation was evaluated;and the complications of subcutaneous catheterization,incision infection,postoperative nausea vomiting,neurological symptoms,time to extubation,patient satisfaction degree,recovery time of intestinal function and hospital stay were recorded.Results The VAS 4,24,32,48,56 and 72 h after operation in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group:1.000(-0.250,2.250)scores vs.1.000(-1.000,3.000)scores,2.000(1.000,3.000)scores vs.4.000(2.000,6.000)scores,1.000(0.000,2.000)scores vs.3.000(1.000,5.000)scores,2.000(1.000,3.000)scores vs.3.000(1.750,4.250)scores,(1.100±0.934)scores vs.(2.085±0.943)scores and(0.985±0.842)scores vs.(1.814±0.921)scores,and there was statistical difference(P<0.05 or<0.01).The recovery time of intestinal function and hospital stay in observation group were significantly shorter than that that in control group:(1.743±0.557)d vs.(2.200±0.714)d and(8.043±1.160)d vs.(8.757±1.221)d,and there were statistical difference(P<0.01);there were no statistical differences in the rate of incision infection,incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting,time to extubation and patient dissatisfaction rate between two groups(P>0.05);there were no the complications of subcutaneous catheterization and neurological symptoms in two groups.Conclusions The incision subcutaneous porous catheter combined with ropivacaine analgesia after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery is a safe,effective and feasible method.Multimodal analgesia under enhanced recovery after surgery can increase the postoperative recovery after gastrointestinal operations and shorten the postoperative hospital stay.
作者 刘启志 万丽斯 陈国忠 李成 陈骏毅 柳汉荣 陈卓 周德华 陈静 涂小煌 Liu Qizhi;Wan Lisi;Chen Guozhong;Li Cheng;Chen Junyi;Liu Hanrong;Chen Zhuo;Zhou Dehua;Chen Jing;Tu Xiaohuang(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Shanghai Fourth People′s Hospital,School of Medicine,Tongji University,Shanghai 200434,China;Department of Anesthesiology Periopertive Medicine,Shanghai Fourth People′s Hospital,School of Medicine,Tongji University,Shanghai 200434,China)
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2023年第3期271-275,共5页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
基金 上海市虹口区科学技术委员会科研课题(虹卫2202-19)。
关键词 腹腔镜 镇痛 加速康复外科 Laparoscopes Analgesia Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1Dai Menghua,Liu Qiaofei,Xing Cheng,Kleeff Jorg,Liao Quan,Guo Junchao,Han Xianlin,Xu Qiang,Wang Shunda.Early drain removal after major pancreatectomy reduces postoperative complications:a single-center,randomized,controlled trial[J].Journal of Pancreatology,2020,3(2):93-100. 被引量:11
  • 2Dajczman E, Gordon A, Kreisman H, Wolkove N. Long-termpostthoracotomy pain. Chest 1991; 99: 270-274 [PMID: 1989781DOI: 10.1378/chest.99.2.270].
  • 3Wightman JA. A prospective survey of the incidence ofpostoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg 1968; 55: 85-91[PMID: 5635926 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800550202].
  • 4Latimer RG, Dickman M, Day WC, Gunn ML, Schmidt CD.Ventilatory patterns and pulmonary complications after upperabdominal surgery determined by preoperative and postoperativecomputerized spirometry and blood gas analysis. Am J Surg 1971;122: 622-632 [PMID: 4939329 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90290-X].
  • 5Young A, Buvanendran A. Recent advances in multimodalanalgesia. Anesthesiol Clin 2012; 30: 91-100 [PMID: 22405435DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.12.002].
  • 6Elvir-Lazo OL, White PF. Postoperative pain management afterambulatory surgery: role of multimodal analgesia. AnesthesiolClin 2010; 28: 217-224 [PMID: 20488391 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.02.011].
  • 7Zhu Z, Wang C, Xu C, Cai Q. Influence of patient-controlledepidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesiaon postoperative pain control and recovery after gastrectomy forgastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Gastric Cancer2013; 16: 193-200 [PMID: 22806415 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-012-0168-z].
  • 8Hankin CS, Schein J, Clark JA, Panchal S. Adverse eventsinvolving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Am J HealthSyst Pharm 2007; 64: 1492-1499 [PMID: 17617499 DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060220].
  • 9Choi JB, Shim YH, Lee YW, Lee JS, Choi JR, Chang CH.Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomitingin patients with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlledanalgesia and single antiemetic prophylaxis. Yonsei Med J 2014; 55:1430-1435 [PMID: 25048507 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1430].
  • 10Harrison DM, Sinatra R, Morgese L, Chung JH. Epidural narcoticand patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section painrelief. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 454-457 [PMID: 3278653 DOI:10.1097/00000542-198803000-00025].

共引文献261

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部