期刊文献+

汽车前保险杠水平冲击试验的研究 被引量:1

Research of Horizontal Impact Test on the Vehicle Front Bumper
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对两款车型前保险杠进行冲击模块试验。研究结果发现,相比于CAR-B车型,CAR-A车型在前保险杠中部支撑位置(M0)处溃缩位移小,刚度大,中部支撑(M0)刚度与下部支撑(D0)刚度相差较大。同时对两款车型进行Flex-PLI腿型冲击试验,发现CAR-A车辆存在严重失分,其主要原因是由于在柔性腿冲击车辆过程中,CAR-A中M0、D0刚度差导致以膝部为中心向两侧弯曲运动,造成车辆失分。因此,车辆前保险杠应考虑到中部支撑位置和下部支撑位置的刚度匹配,一定程度上可降低对弱势道路使用者的伤害,使得柔性腿碰撞变形更加合理、得分更高。 The impact module tests were conducted on the front bumpers of two models.The results show that the CAR-A model has little collapse displacement and high stiffness at the middle support position(M0)of the front bumper,and the stiffness of the middle support(M0)and the stiffness of the lower support(D0)is quite different compared to the CAR-B model.The Flex PLI leg impact tests were conducted for two models at the same time.It is found that the CAR-A vehicle has a serious loss of points,the main reason is that the M0、D0 stiffness difference of CAR-A front bumper,which leads to the loss of points during the impact of bending to both sides centered on the knee.Therefore,the front bumper of the vehicle should take into account the stiffness matching of the middle support position(M0)and the lower support position(D0),which can reduce the damage to the vulnerable road user(VRU),so that the collision deformation of the flexible leg is more reasonable and the score is higher.
作者 孙海洋 王建硕 裴元津 SUN Haiyang;WANG Jianshuo;PEI Yuanjin(China Automotive Technology&Research Center Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《汽车零部件》 2023年第4期71-74,共4页 Automobile Parts
关键词 冲击模块 前保险杠 Flex-PLI 刚度 impact module front bumper Flex-PLI stiffness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1]王王宣,李宏光.现代汽车安全[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2001.
  • 2[4]Reichert J K,Landolt J P. Digital and Analog Filters for Processing Impact Test Data[J]. SAE Paper, 81081.
  • 3[6]Kaleps I, Whitestone J. HYBRID Geometrical and Inertial Properties[J]. SAE Paper, 880638.
  • 4沈宇明.行人交通事故人员伤害分析及防护措施[J].汽车与安全,2007(8):70-73. 被引量:10
  • 5Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety Phase 2 (IG PS2 ). History of development of the flexible pedestrian legform im- pactor, GTR9-C-04 [ S]. Bonn: Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) ,2011.
  • 6Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety. Proposal to Develop A- mendments to Global Technical RegulationNo. 9, ECE/ TRANS/WP. 29/GRSP/ 2009/ 21 [ S ]. Bonn: Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) ,2009.
  • 7GEHRING D U. Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Flex GTR Evaluation Tests, TEG-141 [ R ]. Bergisch Gladbach: Flex-PLI Technical Evaluation Group(Flex-TEG) ,2010.
  • 8Euro NCAP Commission. European new car assessment pro- gram, pedestrian impact, Euro NCAP [ S/OLI. [2013-08- 01 ]. http://www, euroncap, corn/tests, htm.
  • 9NFSS. Flex PLI GTR User Manual, GTR 9-3-04 [R]. Paris: Informal Group On Pedestrian Safety Phase 2 (IG PS2 ) ,2012.
  • 10ROBERT KANT. Flex PLI GTR-FE v2. 0, GTR 9-2-09 [R]. Osaka: Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety Phase 2 ( IG PS2) ,2012.

共引文献10

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部