岸田内阁官邸主导决策特征及其实施困境——以“经济安保法”的出台过程为例

An Analysis of Kishida Cabine􀆳s Prime Minister􀆳s Leadership in Decision-making:Features and Implementation Dilemma——Take the Promulgation Process of“Economic Security Bill”as an Example

为有效应对此前政权遗留的官邸决策弊端并谋求执政长期稳固,岸田内阁在政府决策上一方面延续官邸主导形式,另一方面在官邸决策过程中寻求兼顾与外部决策主体的意见协调。作为内阁“看板政策”推进的重要一环,在“经济安保法”的制定出台过程中,官邸主导的“延续性”及“协调性”特征均得到了明显体现。但在官邸主导的实地推进中,岸田内阁仍受到来自首相个人政治领导力“缺位”的严重制约,进而导致官邸主导实际政策效果整体不佳。加之制度及国内政治因素层面的相互影响,首相亦难以破解其在政治领导上的不力困局。伴随执政基础的长时期弱化,岸田内阁推进官邸主导的整体前景也难言明朗。

In order to effectively deal with the disadvantages of the official residence decision making left by the previous regime and seek long-term stability in power,the Kishida Cabinet continues the official residence-led form of government decision-making on the one hand,and on the other hand,it sought for the coordination of opinions and opinions of external decision-making subjects in the process of decision-making of the official residence.As an important part of the promotion of the cabinet􀆳s“kanban policy”,the“continuity”and“coordination”characteristics of the official residence were clearly reflected in the process of formulation and introduction of the Economic Security Bill.However,in the actual implementation led by the official residence,the Kishida Cabinet was still severely restricted by the“lack of”personal political leadership of the Prime Minister,which led to the overall poor actual effect of the official residence-led policy.Coupled with the mutual influence of institutional and domestic political factors,it is also difficult for the Prime Minister to resolve the dilemma of his ineffective political leadership.With the weakening of the governing foundation for a long time,the overall outlook for the Kishida cabinet to promote the leadership of the official residence is also uncertain.