期刊文献+

职业冲击的新分类及不同理论视角下的影响效应

A new categorization of career shocks and their effects basedon different theoretical explanations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有研究大多以职业冲击的影响结果为划分依据,将其区分为正面职业冲击(意外加薪等)和负面职业冲击(意外失业等)。然而,由于忽略了个体认知差异或时间等因素,这种分类方式有失偏颇。基于压力认知评价理论,对职业冲击提出新的分类方式——挑战性和阻碍性职业冲击;并依据所提出的新分类方式,基于压力认知评价理论、工作要求−资源模型、情感事件理论和事件系统理论,提出了基于多视角的职业冲击作用机制整合模型。 Most previous studies agree that career shocks can be either positively(receiving an unexpected award)or negatively(unexpectedly losing one’s job)valenced.However,due to individual differences in the cognition of events or time factors,this categorization may have some shortcomings.Based on the transactional model of stress and coping,the present study proposes a new classification of career shocks,namely,challenging and hindering career shocks,and further explores the mechanism underlying the impacts of career shocks on individual behaviour based on the transactional model of stress and coping,the job demands-resources model,affective event theory,and event system theory;finally,the paper clarifies when and why career shocks have positive or negative impacts on employees.
作者 张莹 张剑 张静雅 巩振兴 ZHANG Ying;ZHANG Jian;ZHANG Jingya;GONG Zhenxing(School of Economics and Management,China University of Geosciences Beijing,Beijing 100083,China;School of Economics and Management,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China;School of Business,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252000,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第5期854-865,共12页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(72041018,71771022) 北京市自然科学基金项目(9202010)。
关键词 职业冲击 认知评价 动机倾向 情感反应 事件属性 Career shocks cognitive appraisals motivation orientation affect reaction event attributes
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献166

  • 1梁小威,廖建桥,曾庆海.基于工作嵌入核心员工组织绩效——自愿离职研究模型的拓展与检验[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):106-115. 被引量:97
  • 2王莉,石金涛.组织嵌入及其对员工工作行为影响的实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(3):14-18. 被引量:56
  • 3Allen, N. J., Meyer, J. P.. Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to The Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1996, (3): 252-276.
  • 4Vandenberg, R. J., Nelson, J. B.. Disaggregating the Motives Underlying Turnover Intentions: When Do Intentions Predict Turnover Behavior. Human Relations, 1999, (10): 1313-1336.
  • 5Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M., Burnfield, J. L.. Development of a Global Measure of Job Embeddedness and Integration into a Traditional Model of Voluntary Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, (4): 1031-1042.
  • 6Price, J. L., L Mueller, C. W.. A Causal Model of Turnover for Nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, (3): 543-565.
  • 7Reichers, A.. A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Academy of Management Review, 1985, (3): 465-476.
  • 8Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., Henagan, S. C.. A Relational Perspective on Turnover: Examining Structural, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, (4): 607-618.
  • 9Friedman, R. A., Holtom, B.. The Effects of Network Groups on Minority Employee Turnover Intentions. Human Resource Management, 2002, (4): 405-421.
  • 10Abelson, M. A.. Examination of Avoidable and Unavoidable Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, (3): 382-386.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部