期刊文献+

尺骨冠状突骨折双柱分型及其临床意义

Double column classification system of ulnar coronoid process fractures and its clinical significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 根据尺骨冠状突内外侧柱的概念提出尺骨冠状突骨折双柱分型,通过临床研究验证该分型的可行性并探讨其临床意义。方法 回顾性分析2012-06—2016-06手术治疗的107例尺骨冠状突骨折,根据“柱”的概念将尺骨冠状突骨折分为内侧柱骨折、外侧柱骨折和双柱骨折,其中外侧柱骨折60例,内侧柱骨折17例,双柱骨折30例。30例外侧柱骨折采用非手术治疗,30例外侧柱骨折进行手术治疗,内侧柱骨折与双柱骨折均采用手术治疗,手术细节根据不同的损伤类型和骨折分型决定。结果 107例均获得随访,随访时间平均20(15~42)个月。手术患者未出现骨折不愈合和内固定失败,骨折愈合时间平均3.5(3~5)个月。末次随访时内侧柱骨折组屈伸弧为(98±15)°,前臂旋转弧为(137±22)°,肘关节功能Mayo评分为(92±7)分。外侧柱骨折组屈伸弧为(107±20)°,前臂旋转弧为(141±18)°,肘关节功能Mayo评分为(95±8)分。双柱骨折组屈伸弧为(95±19)°,前臂旋转弧为(134±16)°,肘关节功能Mayo评分为(89±10)分。末次随访时肘关节功能评定结果:优40例,良37例,可26例,差4例。术后10例肘关节轻度异位骨化但无需手术治疗,7例术后因并发症需进行二次手术。结论 尺骨冠状突骨折双柱分型较O’Driscoll分型简单,较Regan-Morrey分型更强调尺骨冠状突立体概念,为临床医师制定不同治疗策略提供指导,在重视内侧柱稳定、降低术后功能障碍发生率方面具有一定的临床意义。 Objective To propose the double column classification of ulnar coronoid process fractures based on the concept of the medial and lateral columns of the ulnar coronoid process,verify the feasibility of the classification and investigate its clinical significance through clinical studies.Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 107 cases of ulnar coronoid process frac-tures treated by operation from June 2012 to June 2016.According to the concept of“column”,ulnar coronal process fractures were divided into medial column fractures,lateral column fractures and double column fractures.Sixty cases were lateral col-umn fractures,17 cases medial column fractures and 30 cases double column fractures.And 30 cases of lateral column frac-tures were treated by non-operation,30 cases of lateral column fractures were treated by operation,and both medial column fractures and double column fractures were treated by surgical treatment.The surgical details depended on different injury types and fracture types.ResultsAll 107 cases were followed up for an average of 20(range,15-42)months.There was no fracture nonunion and failure of internal fixation,and the average fracture healing time was 3.5(range,3-5)months.At the last follow-up,the flexion and extension arc of the medial column fracture group was(98±15)°,the forearm rotation arc was(137±22)°,and the Mayo score of elbow joint function was(92±7).In the lateral column fracture group,the flexion and extension arc was(107±20)°,the forearm rotation arc was(141±18)°,and the Mayo score of elbow joint function was(95±8).In the double column fracture group,the flexion and extension arc was(95±19),the forearm rotation arc was(134±16)°,and the Mayo score of elbow joint function was(89±10).At the last follow-up,the function of elbow joint was excellent in 40 cases,good in 37 cas-es,fair in 26 cases and poor in 4 cases.After operation,the mild heterotopic ossification of elbow joint occurred in 10 cases but the surgical treatment was not needed,and 7 cases needed secondary operation because of postoperative complications.Conclusion The double column classification of ulnar coronoid process fracture is simpler than Regan-Morrey classification,and emphasizes the three-dimensional concept of ulnar coronoid process more than O'Drislass classification.It provides guidance for clinicians to formulate different treatment strategies,and has certain clinical significance in paying attention to the stability of medial column and reducing the incidence of postoperative dysfunction.
作者 刘观燚 胡利华 沈锋 廖旭昱 韩金明 陈剑明 LIU Guanyi;HU Lihua;SHEN Feng;LIAO Xuyu;HAN Jinming;CHEN Jianming(Department of Orthopedics,Ningbo NO.6 Hospital,Ningbo,Zhejiang 315040)
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2023年第3期257-261,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 浙江省2017年度151人才工程培养项目 浙江省2022年度卫生创新人才培养项目 宁波市医学科技计划项目(2019Y52)。
关键词 肘关节 尺骨冠状突骨折 双柱分型 内侧柱骨折 外侧柱骨折 双柱骨折 Elbow joint Ulnar coronoid process fracture Double column classification Medial column fracture Lateral column fracture Doublecolumnfracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1杨顺,向明,杨国勇,陈杭,胡小川,唐浩琛.肘关节镜辅助下复位固定治疗尺骨冠状突骨折[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(3):144-150. 被引量:8
  • 2王健,张怀保,陈雷,滕红林,杨胜武,叶澄宇.可吸收螺钉在新鲜不稳定腕舟骨骨折中的临床应用[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(2):99-100. 被引量:21
  • 3CV Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, Cohen MS, et al. Difficult elbowfractures: pearls and pilfalls[ j] . Instr Course Led, 2003,52: 113-134.
  • 4Budoff JE. Coronoid fractures[J]. J Hand Surg Am,2012,37( II):2418-2423.
  • 5Dodds SD,Fishier T. Terrible triad of the elbow[ j] . Orthop ClinNorth Am,2013,44( 1):47-58.
  • 6Taylor TK, Scham SM. A posteromedial aj>pn)at*h to the proximalend of the ulna for the internal fixation of olecraiwrn fractures[ j] . JTrauma, 1969,9(7) :594-602.
  • 7Hotchkiss HN, Kaaparyan GN. The medial “Over ihe top” approachto the elbow[J]. Tech Orthop,2000,15(2) : 105-112.
  • 8Huh Jt Krueger CA,Medvecky MJ, et al. Metlial elbow exposurefor coronoid fractures: FCU-split versus over-the-top[ j] . J OrthopTrauma,2013,27( 12) :730-734.
  • 9Mathew PK, Athwal GS, King GJ. Terrible triad injury of Oieelbow: current concepts[J] . J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2009,17(3):137-151.
  • 10Han SH, Yoon HK, Rhee SY, et al. Anterior approach for fixatiraiof isolated type IH coronoid process fracture[J] . Kur J Orlhoj) SurgTraumatol, 2013,23 (4) : 395-405.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部