摘要
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪不是帮助犯的量刑规则,量刑规则说对正犯化说的批判是在共犯论层面的曲解。帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的成立要求行为人的技术帮助行为从属于正犯的实行行为,将其作为帮助行为正犯化的理解适用,能够最大限度从实质上对法益进行保护,且符合网络时代刑事立法和司法解释的预防性理念与积极刑法观。在行为人对他人利用其技术服务实施犯罪具有明知时,应以其行为是否违背正当业务规范、是否超出正常业务行为范畴作为实质标准限制其入罪。
The crime of helping information network criminal activities is not a sentencing rule for the accessory,and the critique of the accessory as a principal offender theory is a misinterpretation at the level of accomplice theory.The establishment of the crime of assisting information cybercrime requires that the actor's technical help behavior is subordinate to the implementation of the positive offense,and its application as the understanding of the positive offense of helping behavior can maximize the protection of the legal interests in substance,and in line with the preventive concept and positive criminal law concept of criminal legislation and judicial interpretation in the network era.When the perpetrator knowingly uses his technical services to commit a crime,the substantive criteria should be whether his behavior is contrary to proper business norms and beyond the scope of normal business behavior to limit his incrimination.
作者
毛政
马松建
MAO Zheng;MA Songjian(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处
《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第2期43-47,共5页
Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
关键词
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪
帮助犯量刑规则
正犯化
中立帮助行为
司法适用
crime of assisting information cybercrime
sentencing rule for accessory
criminalizing the accessory as a principal offender
neutral helping behavior judicial application