摘要
刚性手段抗诉和柔性手段检察建议的结合适用,展示了检察机关在行政争议实质性化解中的监督纠正者角色。检察机关的体制优势为汇聚各方合力搭建平台,展示了检察机关在行政争议实质性化解中的和解促成者角色。作为法律监督概念宪法化之后的一种自主性发展形态,检察机关在履行法律监督职责中开展行政争议实质性化解工作,需要回归监督法律实施的本义,做好行政法律统一正确实施的监督者。作为记载行政检察监督实践成果的指导性案例,应当逐步实现从政策宣示型、方法推广型向统一适法型、规则价值型的模式转变。
The Supreme People’s Procuratorate’s guiding cases provide an excellent sample for examining the role of procuratorial organs in the substantive resolution of administrative disputes.The combination of rigid means of protest and flexible means of procuratorial suggestions shows the role of procuratorial organs in this process.The constitutional system of procuratorial organsprovides a platform for bringing together all parties and highlight their role as facilitators of reconciliation in the substantive resolution of administrative disputes.As a form of independent development after the concept of legal supervision has been constitutionalized,procuratorial organs need to return to their original role of supervising the implementation of laws and become supervisors of the unified and correct implementation of administrative laws in their work of substantive resolution of administrative disputes.As a guiding case that records the achievements of administrative procuratorial supervision practice,it should gradually realize the modal transformation from the policy declaration type and method promotion type to the uniform and appropriate method type and rule value type.
出处
《中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期134-141,共8页
Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.P.C(Chinese Academy of Governance)
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“行政诉讼实质性解决争议的制度构造”(编号:21AFX008)。
关键词
检察机关
行政争议
实质性化解
角色定位
Procuratorial Organ
Administrative Disputes
Substantive Resolution
Role Positioning