期刊文献+

艺术哲学的理论形态与研究范式 被引量:1

The Theoretical Form and Research Paradigm of Art Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,在艺术学理论研究中,艺术与哲学的互动渐成显学,尤其是艺术学理论学科增列“艺术哲学”研究方向,其研究视域极大拓展了艺术学理论学科运用辩证法、辩证逻辑思考艺术问题的空间。其实,艺术与哲学的关系问题在没有学科参与之前,就已经存在于哲人对艺术问题的思考中,艺术哲学的研究形态一直致力于回答“艺术是什么”的问题。然而,在学科体系中再次提出“艺术是什么”这一设问,则需要在阐释哲学与艺术基本认知的基础上加以反思,以解答“艺术做什么”的问题。故而,借助相应的研究范式对艺术学理论学科发展中的艺术形而上问题进行阐释,则可以借助哲学认识论形成多元把握艺术哲学的范式理路,比如以艺术的主体性和主体间性来思考并回答“艺术做什么”的问题。这或许是一条解释艺术学理论内在、外在结构问题的有效途径。 The question of the relationship between art and philosophy has existed in philosophers'thinking about art before the participation of disciplines.The research form of art philosophy has been devoted to how to answer the question of"What is art",However,the question of"What is art"is put forward again in the discipline system,which needs to be reflected on the basis of explaining the basic cognition of philosophy and art to answer the question of"what art does".Therefore,with the help of corresponding research paradigms to explain the metaphysical problems of art in the development of the discipline of art theory,we can form a pluralistic grasp of the paradigm of art philosophy with the help of philosophical epistemology,such as thinking and answering the question of"what art does"with the subjectivity and intersubjectivity of art.This may be an effective way to explain the internal and external mutual structure of art theory.
作者 夏燕靖 XIA Yan-jing(Institute of Arts and Humanities,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 201100)
出处 《艺术百家》 北大核心 2023年第2期27-36,共10页 Hundred Schools In Arts
基金 2020年度国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“跨门类艺术史学理论与方法研究”(项目编号:20ZD25)阶段性成果之一。
关键词 艺术哲学 多元化阐释艺术 理论形态 研究范式 Philosophy of Art Diversified Interpretation of Art Theoretical Form Research Paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1凌继尧.艺术学:诞生与形成[J].江苏社会科学,1998(4):84-89. 被引量:28
  • 2Nicolas Wolterstorff, "Toward an Ontology of Art Works", Nous, No. 9 (1975): 126.
  • 3Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976, pp. 112-113, pp. 118-119, p. 156.
  • 4Richard Wonheim, Art and Its Objects, London: Cambridge University Press, 1980, pp. 152-153,p. 4, pp. 4-36, pp. 36-43, pp. 43-74, pp. 16-21, 205-226, p. 76.
  • 5Maurice Mandelbaum, "Family Resemblances and Generalization Concerning the Arts", American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 2 (1965): 221-225.
  • 6Arthur Danto, "The Artworld", The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 61 (1964): 579.
  • 7Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art, p. 4.
  • 8Joseph Margolis, Art and Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1980, pp. 22-75.
  • 9Joseph Margolis, "The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art", The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 36, No. 1 (1977): 48-49.
  • 10《柏拉图文艺对话集》,朱光潜译,人民文学出版社1963年版,第272页.

共引文献47

同被引文献93

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部